Suppr超能文献

接受肉毒杆菌毒素注射的脑瘫患者的程序性疼痛管理:系统评价和荟萃分析

Procedural Pain Management in Patients with Cerebral Palsy Undergoing Botulinum Toxin Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Faccioli Silvia, Ehsani Alessandro, Kaleci Shaniko, Tonini Giulia, Tagliani Ilaria, Vetrano Mario, Sassi Silvia

机构信息

Pediatric Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2025 Jun 22;17(7):317. doi: 10.3390/toxins17070317.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review is to investigate effectiveness and safety of sedation-analgesia techniques in controlling pain during botulinum injections in patients with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHODS

The Pubmed, Cinahl, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: cerebral palsy; any type of outcome measure regarding pain and side effects assessment; any type of studies; and English language. RoB2 and Robins-I were applied to assess the risk of bias. Tables and forest plots synthetized the findings.

RESULTS

Seventeen reports were included; most regarded pain control, and ten investigated side effects. Three were RCTs, three were controlled, and twelve were observational studies. Several techniques were used, often in combination, such as non-pharmacological approaches (clown care or virtual reality); topical anesthesia with Emla, vapocoolant spray, or ice; and light-to-deep sedation with inhaled nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, rectal, enteral, or intravenous midazolam, or intravenous ketamine or propofol. Vomiting and oxygen desaturation were uncommon complications. Conversely, the pooled incidence of other minor side effects was 6.39% (95% CI: 1.47-14.42%) under the random-effects model, with considerable heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

All the techniques are safe, if administered in an appropriate setting. Deep sedation is more effective in pain control but requires an anesthetist. A combined individualized approach is preferrable. PROSPERO CRD42025639999.

摘要

背景

本系统评价的目的是研究镇静镇痛技术在控制脑瘫(CP)患者肉毒杆菌注射期间疼痛方面的有效性和安全性。

方法

检索了PubMed、Cinahl和Scopus数据库。纳入标准如下:脑瘫;任何关于疼痛和副作用评估的结局测量类型;任何类型的研究;以及英文文献。应用RoB2和Robins-I评估偏倚风险。通过表格和森林图综合研究结果。

结果

纳入了17份报告;大多数涉及疼痛控制,10份研究了副作用。3项为随机对照试验,3项为对照研究,12项为观察性研究。使用了多种技术,且常联合使用,如非药物方法(小丑护理或虚拟现实);使用复方利多卡因乳膏、挥发性冷却剂喷雾或冰敷进行表面麻醉;以及使用吸入氧化亚氮、鼻内芬太尼、直肠、肠内或静脉注射咪达唑仑,或静脉注射氯胺酮或丙泊酚进行浅至深度镇静。呕吐和氧饱和度降低是不常见的并发症。相反,在随机效应模型下,其他轻微副作用的合并发生率为6.39%(95%CI:1.47-14.42%),存在相当大的异质性。

结论

如果在适当的环境中实施,所有技术都是安全的。深度镇静在疼痛控制方面更有效,但需要麻醉师。综合个体化方法更可取。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库编号CRD42025639999。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fb3/12298486/9ab0e7f2ac00/toxins-17-00317-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验