Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Via dell'Istria 65/1, 34100, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
World J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;15(5):432-440. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00264-0. Epub 2019 May 16.
Patients with cognitive impairment due to cerebral palsy experience pain more often than healthy peers and frequently require diagnostic and therapeutic painful procedures. Analgesia and procedural sedation outside the operating room are often required, but they may not adequately be provided because of the inability to accurately recognize and classify the state of pain and for the perceived higher risk of complications.
We reviewed the available literature to highlight the specific risk factors and area of criticism, that should be further improved. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Pubmed from 1987 to September 2018 using key words such as 'cerebral palsy and children and pain' or 'sedation and cerebral palsy and children'.
While different pain scales are useful in recognizing pain expressions, anxiety scales are not available. Moreover, studies on non-pharmacological techniques do not always have comparable results. Several risk factors, from anatomic abnormalities to liver and kidney functioning, should be kept in mind before proceeding with sedation.
Large trials are needed to assess the impact of non-pharmacological techniques and to evaluate which pain control strategy (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) should be used in different settings.
脑瘫导致认知障碍的患者比健康同龄人更常经历疼痛,并且经常需要进行诊断和治疗性疼痛操作。因此经常需要在手术室以外进行镇痛和程序镇静,但由于无法准确识别和分类疼痛状态,以及感知到并发症风险较高,可能无法充分提供这些治疗。
我们回顾了现有文献,重点强调了需要进一步改进的特定风险因素和批评领域。我们使用“脑瘫和儿童和疼痛”或“镇静和脑瘫和儿童”等关键词,检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、Pubmed 从 1987 年到 2018 年 9 月的可用文献。
虽然不同的疼痛量表有助于识别疼痛表现,但目前还没有焦虑量表。此外,非药物治疗技术的研究结果并不总是具有可比性。在进行镇静之前,应考虑到从解剖异常到肝肾功能等多种风险因素。
需要进行大型试验来评估非药物技术的影响,并评估在不同情况下应使用哪种疼痛控制策略(药物和非药物)。