• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹与卡尔·施图姆普夫论协和音与不协和音]

[Hermann von Helmholtz and Carl Stumpf on consonance and dissonance].

作者信息

Kursell Julia

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin.

出版信息

Ber Wiss. 2008 Jun;31(2):130-43. doi: 10.1002/bewi.200801314.

DOI:10.1002/bewi.200801314
PMID:19048722
Abstract

The article juxtaposes Hermann von Helmholtz's work in the experimental physiology of hearing and Carl Stumpf's tone psychology, focusing on the problem of consonance and dissonance in music. It argues that the experimental set-up plays a major role in the approaches to hearing of both Helmholtz and Stumpf, shaping their redefinition of the musical concepts of consonance and dissonance. Helmholtz, however, explains dissonance as resulting from the beats that are heard when sound waves interfere, while Stumpf explains consonance from the fusion (Verschmelzung) of sounds, noting that two tones, depending on their distance cannot always be recognized as two but are heard as one single tone. Helmholtz's definition of dissonance eventually threatens his own theory of hearing, which is based on the mechanical principle of resonance and considers sound to be composed of sinusoidal waves. Both the physical and the mathematical tools he uses cannot easily be brought into accordance with his experimental findings on beats, which ask for a discrimination of fast changes in intensity. Dissonance thus becomes "unrecomendable" for Helmholtz, because it overstrains the ear. Stumpf's research, in contrast, has its point of departure in the historically given set of intervals and tries to find a principle that would explain this choice. His tests with experimental subjects who have no conscious knowledge of musical harmony and prove incapable to follow or reproduce music reveals to him a difference between the unity and multiplicity of tones.

摘要

这篇文章将赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹在听觉实验生理学方面的工作与卡尔·施图姆普夫的音调心理学并列起来,重点关注音乐中的协和与不协和问题。文章认为,实验装置在亥姆霍兹和施图姆普夫的听觉研究方法中都起着重要作用,塑造了他们对协和与不协和这两个音乐概念的重新定义。然而,亥姆霍兹将不协和解释为声波干涉时听到的拍频所致,而施图姆普夫则从声音的融合(Verschmelzung)来解释协和,并指出两个音,取决于它们之间的距离,并不总是能被识别为两个音,而是被听作一个单音。亥姆霍兹对不协和的定义最终威胁到了他自己基于共振力学原理且认为声音由正弦波组成的听觉理论。他所使用的物理和数学工具都难以轻易地与他关于拍频的实验结果相一致,而这些实验结果需要对强度的快速变化进行辨别。因此,不协和对于亥姆霍兹来说变得“不可取”,因为它使耳朵负担过重。相比之下,施图姆普夫的研究从历史给定的音程集合出发,试图找到一个能解释这种选择的原则。他对那些没有音乐和声的有意识知识且无法跟随或再现音乐的实验对象进行的测试,向他揭示了音的统一性和多样性之间的差异。

相似文献

1
[Hermann von Helmholtz and Carl Stumpf on consonance and dissonance].[赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹与卡尔·施图姆普夫论协和音与不协和音]
Ber Wiss. 2008 Jun;31(2):130-43. doi: 10.1002/bewi.200801314.
2
[Tone psychology and music research as catalysts of experimental-scientific practice and methodology in the circle of Carl Stumpf].
Ber Wiss. 2008 Sep;31(3):195-210. doi: 10.1002/bewi.200801313.
3
A Third Note: Helmholtz, Palestrina, and the Early History of Musicology.第三条注释:亥姆霍兹、帕莱斯特里纳与音乐学早期历史
Isis. 2015 Jun;106(2):353-66. doi: 10.1086/682003.
4
Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans.音乐和弦的协和与不协和:猴子和人类听觉皮层中的神经关联
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Dec;86(6):2761-88. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.2761.
5
Consonance and pitch.协和音和音高。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1142-58. doi: 10.1037/a0030830. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
6
[Hermann von Helmholtz--a physicist in medicine].[赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹——医学领域的物理学家]
Med Arh. 1999;53(4):239-42.
7
Hermann von Helmholtz's empirico-transcendentalism reconsidered: construction and constitution in Helmholtz's psychology of the object.重新审视赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹的经验先验论:亥姆霍兹客体心理学中的建构与构成
Sci Context. 2014 Dec;27(4):709-44. doi: 10.1017/s026988971400026x.
8
Stumpf's cognitive--evaluative theory of emotion.施托姆普夫的情绪认知-评价理论。
Am Psychol. 1992 Jan;47(1):34-45. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.1.34.
9
Hermann von Helmholtz and the empiricist vision.赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹与经验主义视角
J Hist Behav Sci. 1977 Jan;13(1):48-58. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(197701)13:1<48::aid-jhbs2300130106>3.0.co;2-l.
10
Good vibrations: "sirens," soundscapes, and physiology.良好的振动:“警笛声”、声景与生理学
James Joyce Q. 2008;46(3-4):481-96. doi: 10.1353/jjq.2008.0050.