Burger Martin, Hoppe Ulrich, Lohscheller Jörg, Eysholdt Ulrich, Döllinger Michael
Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Bohlenplatz 21, Erlangen, Germany.
Ear Hear. 2009 Feb;30(1):16-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818fbb9d.
The aim of the study was to determine whether cortical auditory potentials evoked by monosyllabic words beginning with a single consonant can be attributed to a combination of two N1/P2 complexes, temporally separated by voice-onset time (VOT).
Cortical auditory-evoked potentials were recorded in seven normal-hearing young adults in response to two types of stimuli (a) simple tone bursts and (b) five monosyllabic words with different VOTs. Cortical burst responses (mainly consisting of N1 and P2) formed the basic functions for the simulation of speech-evoked potentials. Actually, two basic functions were created with respect to different VOTs of the speech sounds. An optimization procedure was used to determine the relative contributions of the two N1/P2 complexes.
Speech-evoked potentials differed clearly across the stimuli. In all subjects, close matches of the synthetic and the measured waveforms could be gained for all speech sounds. The relative magnitudes of the constituent complexes differed among stimuli.
The auditory-evoked response to a monosyllabic speech sound with short VOT can be represented by two overlapping N1/P2 complexes-one to syllable onset and the second to vowel onset. The temporal separation between the two components is well predicted by VOT, but the relative amplitudes vary across syllables. Observed variability in the fitting accuracy across subjects is small.
本研究旨在确定以单个辅音开头的单音节词诱发的皮质听觉电位是否可归因于两个N1/P2复合体的组合,这两个复合体在时间上由语音起始时间(VOT)分隔。
记录了7名听力正常的年轻成年人对两种类型刺激的皮质听觉诱发电位:(a)简单的纯音脉冲和(b)五个具有不同VOT的单音节词。皮质脉冲反应(主要由N1和P2组成)构成了模拟言语诱发电位的基本函数。实际上,针对语音的不同VOT创建了两个基本函数。使用优化程序来确定两个N1/P2复合体的相对贡献。
不同刺激下的言语诱发电位有明显差异。在所有受试者中,所有语音的合成波形和测量波形都能得到紧密匹配。不同刺激下组成复合体的相对大小有所不同。
对具有短VOT的单音节语音的听觉诱发电反应可以由两个重叠的N1/P2复合体表示——一个对应音节起始,另一个对应元音起始。两个成分之间的时间间隔可以通过VOT很好地预测,但相对幅度在不同音节间有所变化。观察到的不同受试者拟合精度的变异性较小。