García Torrecillas Juan Manuel, Torío Durántez Jesús, Lea Pereira María Carmen, García Tirado María Carmen, Aguilera Tejero Ramiro
Medicina de Familia. Unidad Docente de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria de Jaén. Jaén. España. Medicina de Familia. Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas. Almería. España.
Aten Primaria. 2008 Sep;40(9):455-61. doi: 10.1157/13126422.
To find out the magnitude of violence against female partners among patients who visit their family doctor. To study frequency and acceptance of its investigation by the family doctor and to assess the effectiveness of a screening question on abuse.
Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Primary care, 4 samples from 2 urban health centres in Jaén, Spain.
Who participated 170 women randomly selected from the female consulting population.
Interviews by means of the Bradley modified test and the anxiety and depression Goldberg scales. Perceived health, frequency of detection of domestic violence, by the family doctor, and female opinions were also studied.
During the last year, abuse against women was detected in 22.9% of the female population consulting their family doctor (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 16.6-29.2). Abused women had a worse perception of health (odds ratio [OR] =4.2; 95% CI, 1.02-17.5) and a higher probability of depression (OR=4.7; 95% CI, 1.8-12.5) independently from the rest of variables. The question "How are the things going with your partner?" as a screening of abuse does obtain a positive probability quotient of 6.23 (95% CI, 3.6-10.9), a specificity of 89% and a negative predictive value of 90%. Of those interviewed, 96.5% would not mind if their family doctor approached the couple's relationships, a situation that occurs in 24.7% of cases.
Some degree of abuse was detected in almost a quarter of women who consult their family doctor. Family doctors do not usually ask about family and partner relationships and environment, although for almost all women it is well appreciated and the item has an increased likelihood ratio and high negative predictive value in detecting abuse.
了解前往家庭医生处就诊的患者中针对女性伴侣的暴力行为程度。研究家庭医生对其进行调查的频率和接受程度,并评估一个关于虐待的筛查问题的有效性。
描述性横断面研究。
西班牙哈恩市2个城市健康中心的4个样本的初级保健机构。
从女性咨询人群中随机抽取的170名女性。
通过布拉德利改良测试以及焦虑和抑郁戈德堡量表进行访谈。还研究了感知健康状况、家庭医生对家庭暴力的检测频率以及女性的意见。
在过去一年中,在前往家庭医生处就诊的女性人群中,有22.9%的人被检测出遭受虐待(95%置信区间[95%CI],16.6 - 29.2)。受虐女性对健康的感知较差(优势比[OR]=4.2;95%CI,1.02 - 17.5),且独立于其他变量,患抑郁症的概率更高(OR = 4.7;95%CI,1.8 - 12.5)。“你和你的伴侣关系如何?”这个作为虐待筛查的问题,其阳性概率商为6.23(95%CI,3.6 - 10.9),特异性为89%,阴性预测值为90%。在接受访谈的人中,96.5%的人不介意他们的家庭医生询问夫妻关系情况,而这种情况在24.7%的案例中会出现。
在几乎四分之一前往家庭医生处就诊的女性中检测到了一定程度的虐待行为。家庭医生通常不会询问家庭和伴侣关系及环境情况,尽管几乎所有女性都对此表示赞赏,并且该项目在检测虐待行为时具有增加的似然比和较高的阴性预测值。