Gainsborough Mary, Surman Geraldine, Maestri Giovanna, Colver Allan, Cans Christine
United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Nov;50(11):828-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03141.x.
The validity and reliability of the guidelines of the Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) for the classification of cerebral palsy (CP) were tested by administering 10 written case vignettes via an interactive web-based link to 30 SCPE partners. There was a moderately good level of agreement (kappa=0.59) about inclusion as a CP case on the SCPE database. Classification by CP subtype differed in two main areas: assigning spastic versus dyskinetic and judgement of distribution of spastic involvement. Agreement on Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level was less good than reported in previous studies. Twenty respondents repeated the test 5 months later and there was good repeatability for case inclusion (kappa= 0.72) but considerable variation in assignment of CP subtype and GMFCS level. There is a need for further collaborative work and training to improve harmonization of the classification of CP, including examination, application of SCPE guidelines, and register coding.
通过基于网络的交互式链接,向30位欧洲脑瘫监测(SCPE)合作伙伴提供10份书面病例 vignettes,以测试欧洲脑瘫监测(SCPE)指南对脑瘫(CP)分类的有效性和可靠性。对于是否纳入SCPE数据库中的CP病例,存在中等程度的良好一致性(kappa=0.59)。CP亚型的分类在两个主要方面存在差异:区分痉挛型与运动障碍型以及痉挛性受累分布的判断。关于粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平的一致性不如先前研究报告的那样好。20名受访者在5个月后重复了测试,病例纳入具有良好的可重复性(kappa=0.72),但CP亚型和GMFCS水平的分配存在相当大的差异。需要进一步开展协作工作和培训,以改善CP分类的一致性,包括检查、SCPE指南的应用和登记编码。