Odze R D, Lauwers G Y
Gastrointestinal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Endoscopy. 2008 Dec;40(12):1008-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103416. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
This review focuses on the histopathological evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens in Barrett's esophagus, and on the histopathological, biological, and molecular properties of postablation Barrett's esophagus. EMR may be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Diagnostic accuracy regarding the grade and stage of neoplasms is improved with the use of EMR, but the value of this technique for treatment is more controversial because of the high prevalence rate of positive margins and the rate of metachronous lesions found elsewhere in the esophagus during follow-up. Ablation techniques, such as argon plasma coagulation, photodynamic therapy, and radiofrequency ablation, are used increasingly for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus and related neoplasms, often in combination with EMR. A common problem after use of these techniques is the development of islands of neosquamous epithelium (NSE) which can overlie buried Barrett's (and/or dysplasia) epithelium. This is, therefore, concealed to the endoscopist's view and may be allowed to progress to cancer without detection. NSE is histologically similar to normal esophageal squamous epithelium and does not possess the molecular aberrations characteristic of Barrett's esophagus. In contrast, residual nonburied Barrett's esophagus shows persistent pathologic and molecular abnormalities and may progress to cancer upon long term follow-up. The biological potential and rate of progression of nonburied residual Barrett's esophagus following ablation is unclear, but some preliminary studies suggest that the risk may decrease. Buried nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus appears to show decreased biological potential and this may be related to protection from the contents of the lumen by the barrier function of the overlying NSE. On the other hand, anecdotal reports have suggested that buried dysplasia may progress to cancer in some instances.
本综述聚焦于巴雷特食管内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)标本的组织病理学评估,以及消融后巴雷特食管的组织病理学、生物学和分子特性。EMR可用于诊断和治疗目的。使用EMR可提高肿瘤分级和分期的诊断准确性,但由于切缘阳性率高以及随访期间食管其他部位发现异时性病变的发生率高,该技术的治疗价值更具争议性。消融技术,如氩等离子体凝固、光动力疗法和射频消融,越来越多地用于治疗巴雷特食管及相关肿瘤,通常与EMR联合使用。使用这些技术后的一个常见问题是新鳞状上皮岛(NSE)的形成,其可覆盖埋藏的巴雷特(和/或发育异常)上皮。因此,这对内镜医师来说是隐匿的,可能在未被检测到的情况下进展为癌症。NSE在组织学上与正常食管鳞状上皮相似,不具有巴雷特食管特有的分子异常。相比之下,残留的未埋藏巴雷特食管显示出持续的病理和分子异常,长期随访可能进展为癌症。消融后未埋藏的残留巴雷特食管的生物学潜能和进展速度尚不清楚,但一些初步研究表明风险可能降低。埋藏的无发育异常巴雷特食管似乎显示出生物学潜能降低,这可能与上方NSE的屏障功能对管腔内容物的保护有关。另一方面,有轶事报道表明,在某些情况下,埋藏的发育异常可能进展为癌症。