Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗中的心电图 I 导联悖论

The ECG lead I paradox in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Van Gelder Berry M, Bracke Frank A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Dec;31(12):1519-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01221.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the morphology of the QRS complex plays an important role in the determination of the pacing site and effectiveness of stimulation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Review of the electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 737 patients with a CRT device showed a negative QRS complex in lead I during right ventricular (RV) pacing and a positive QRS complex during left ventricular (LV) pacing in four patients. The RV lead was positioned in the high RV septum and the coronary sinus leads in a posterior or postero-lateral basal level. Reversed ECG lead or pacemaker lead connection, anodal RV stimulation, and scar tissue-related depolarization abnormalities were excluded as possible causes.

CONCLUSION

Pacing from the high RV septum may rarely lead to a negative QRS complex and basal positions of the LV lead to a positive QRS complex in lead I during LV pacing. The lead I paradox becomes obvious when both phenomena, that are not interrelated, are present in the same patient.

摘要

背景

在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,QRS波群形态在确定起搏部位和刺激效果方面起着重要作用。

患者和方法

回顾737例植入CRT设备患者的心电图(ECG),发现4例患者右心室(RV)起搏时I导联QRS波群为负向,左心室(LV)起搏时I导联QRS波群为正向。RV电极位于高位RV间隔,冠状窦电极位于后或后外侧基底部。排除了ECG导联或起搏器电极连接反转、阳极RV刺激以及瘢痕组织相关的去极化异常等可能原因。

结论

高位RV间隔起搏可能很少导致I导联QRS波群为负向,而LV电极位于基底部时,LV起搏时I导联QRS波群为正向。当同一患者同时出现这两种不相关的现象时,I导联悖论变得明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验