Kolb Christof, Tzeis Stylianos, Andrikopoulos George, Asbach Stefan, Lemke Bernd, Hansen Claudius, Deisenhofer Isabel, Zrenner Bernhard, Birkenhauer Frank, Vardas Panos E
Deutsches Herzzentrum und 1. Medizinische Klinik rechts der Isar, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Sep;31(3):247-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9575-z. Epub 2011 May 31.
Detrimental effects of right ventricular apical pacing have prompted the search for alternative pacing sites. Data from pacemaker studies suggest that the mid-septum may be a hemodynamically favorable pacing site within the right ventricle. However, data on the safety of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead placement in this location are limited. The aim of the SPICE study is to ascertain that implantation of a ventricular ICD lead at the mid-septum is not inferior to the traditional apical site in terms of feasibility and safety.
In total, 286 patients with the indication for ICD implantation will be included in the study and stratified in a 1:1 ratio to have the lead placed in the right ventricular apex or the mid-septum. Primary outcome measure of this randomized, prospective study is the event-free survival of lead-related complications at 3 months. The combined end point includes the feasibility to reach the randomized pacing site in combination with the achievement of adequate pacing, sensing, and defibrillation thresholds. Data analysis and sample size calculation are based on a non-inferiority design.
This trial will primarily assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of right ventricular ICD lead positioning in the mid-septum compared to the traditional apical position. Documentation of non-inferiority of the novel lead position in terms of applicability and safety will be the prerequisite for potential further trials that may evaluate long-term clinical effects associated with mid-septal lead positions.
右心室心尖部起搏的有害影响促使人们寻找替代起搏部位。起搏器研究数据表明,室间隔中部可能是右心室内血流动力学上较为有利的起搏部位。然而,关于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线在此位置放置的安全性数据有限。SPICE研究的目的是确定在室间隔中部植入心室ICD导线在可行性和安全性方面不劣于传统的心尖部位置。
本研究共纳入286例有ICD植入指征的患者,并按1:1比例分层,将导线分别置于右心室心尖部或室间隔中部。这项随机、前瞻性研究的主要结局指标是3个月时导线相关并发症的无事件生存率。联合终点包括到达随机分配的起搏部位的可行性,以及达到适当的起搏、感知和除颤阈值。数据分析和样本量计算基于非劣效性设计。
与传统的心尖部位置相比,本试验将主要评估右心室ICD导线置于室间隔中部的可行性、安全性和有效性。证明新的导线位置在适用性和安全性方面不劣于传统位置,将是后续可能评估与室间隔中部导线位置相关的长期临床效果的进一步试验的前提条件。