• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上肢固定对驾驶安全的影响。

Effects of upper-limb immobilisation on driving safety.

机构信息

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic & District General Hospital, Oswestry SY10 7AG, UK.

出版信息

Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.029
PMID:19070841
Abstract

Doctors are frequently asked by patients whether it is safe to drive with an upper limb immobilised in a cast. In the literature there are no objective measurements of the effects of upper-limb immobilisation upon driving performance. Eight healthy volunteers performed four 20-min driving circuits in a driving simulator (STISIM 400W), circuits 1 and 4 without immobilisation and circuits 2 and 3 with immobilisation. Immobilisation involved a lightweight below-elbow cast with the thumb left free. Volunteers were randomised to right or left immobilisation for circuit 2, and the contralateral wrist was immobilised for circuit 3. Circuits included urban and rural environments and specific hazards (pedestrians crossing, vehicles emerging from a concealed entrance, traffic lights changing suddenly, avoidance of an oncoming vehicle in the driver's carriageway). Limb immobilisation led to more cautious rural and urban driving, with less adjustment of speed and lateral road position than when unrestricted. However when responding to hazards immobilisation caused less safe driving, with higher speeds, a greater proximity to the hazard before action was taken and less steering adjustment. The effects of restriction upon performance were more prevalent and severe with right-arm immobilisation. Upper-limb immobilisation appears to have little effect on the ability to drive a car unchallenged, but to adversely affect responses to routine hazards. Advice on ability to drive safely should be cautious, as the impact of immobilisation appears to be more subtle and wide ranging than previously thought.

摘要

医生经常被患者询问在上肢用石膏固定的情况下开车是否安全。在文献中,没有对上肢固定对驾驶表现的影响进行客观测量的方法。8 名健康志愿者在驾驶模拟器(STISIM 400W)上进行了 4 次 20 分钟的驾驶循环,循环 1 和 4 不进行固定,循环 2 和 3 进行固定。固定是用一个轻质的肘下石膏,拇指保持自由。志愿者随机接受右手或左手固定,用于循环 2,而对侧手腕在循环 3 中固定。循环包括城市和农村环境以及特定的危险(行人穿越、车辆从隐蔽的入口驶出、交通信号灯突然改变、避免迎面而来的车辆进入驾驶员车道)。肢体固定导致农村和城市驾驶更加谨慎,速度调整和横向道路位置调整都比不受限制时少。然而,在应对危险时,固定会导致更不安全的驾驶,速度更高,在采取行动之前,靠近危险的距离更大,转向调整更少。右侧手臂固定对性能的限制影响更普遍和严重。上肢固定似乎对无挑战驾驶汽车的能力影响不大,但会对常规危险的反应产生不利影响。关于安全驾驶能力的建议应该谨慎,因为固定的影响似乎比之前认为的更微妙和广泛。

相似文献

1
Effects of upper-limb immobilisation on driving safety.上肢固定对驾驶安全的影响。
Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
2
Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task.在一项模拟驾驶任务中,清醒和酒精中毒状态下年轻和成熟驾驶员的间隙接受度及冒险行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1056-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Jul 19.
3
Effects of major-road vehicle speed and driver age and gender on left-turn gap acceptance.主干道车辆速度、驾驶员年龄和性别对左转间隙接受度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jul;39(4):843-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
4
Driving plastered: who does it, is it safe and what to tell patients.酒后驾车:哪些人会这样做,是否安全以及如何告知患者。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):439-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03762.x.
5
Driving with a forearm plaster cast: patients' perspective.佩戴前臂石膏固定时驾车:患者视角
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jun;26(6):405-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.062943.
6
The effects of below-elbow immobilization on driving performance.肘部以下固定对驾驶性能的影响。
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.024. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
7
Immobilisation of the knee and ankle and its impact on drivers' braking times: a driving simulator study.膝关节和踝关节固定及其对驾驶员制动时间的影响:一项驾驶模拟器研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):928-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.25859.
8
The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.重型货车增加对乘用车驾驶员心理负荷和行为的影响:一项模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.029. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
9
Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads.用于双车道乡村道路速度研究的驾驶模拟器。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 May;40(3):1078-87. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.015. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
10
Hyperactive children as young adults: driving abilities, safe driving behavior, and adverse driving outcomes.多动症儿童成年后:驾驶能力、安全驾驶行为及不良驾驶后果
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.008. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to driving post upper or lower extremity orthopaedic surgical procedures: a scoping review of current published literature.上肢或下肢骨科手术后恢复驾驶:对当前已发表文献的范围综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):936-947. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0117.
2
Driving, work, wound care and rehabilitation after carpal tunnel release: Consensus recommendations from a UK Delphi study.腕管松解术后的驾驶、工作、伤口护理及康复:一项英国德尔菲研究的共识性建议
Hand Ther. 2022 Sep;27(3):71-82. doi: 10.1177/17589983221113870. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Return to driving following surgery to the upper limb: a scoping review protocol.
上肢手术后恢复驾驶:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 21;13(6):e070618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070618.
4
Driving after Upper or Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Surgery.上下肢骨科手术后驾车
Joints. 2019 Feb 1;6(4):232-240. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678562. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Effects of Upper Extremity Immobilization and Use of a Spinner Knob on Vehicle Steering.上肢固定及使用旋转旋钮对车辆转向的影响。
Hand (N Y). 2017 Nov;12(6):597-605. doi: 10.1177/1558944716675133. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
6
When Can I Drive After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review.骨科手术后我何时可以开车?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2557-2570. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5007-9. Epub 2016 Aug 4.