Bella Francesco
Roma TRE University, Department of Sciences of Civil Engineering, via Vito Volterra n. 62, 00146 Rome, Italy.
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 May;40(3):1078-87. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.015. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
The paper reports on a validation study of the interactive fixed-base driving simulator of Inter-University Research Center for Road Safety (CRISS) that was effectuated in order to verify the CRISS driving simulator's usefulness at a tool for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Speeds were recorded at eleven measurement sites with different alignment configurations on a two-lane rural road near Rome. The real world was reproduced in the CRISS driving simulator. Forty drivers drove the simulator. The results of the comparative and statistical analysis established the relative validity and also revealed that absolute validity was obtained in nine measurements sites. Only in two non-demanding configurations, were the speeds in simulator significantly higher than those recorded in the field. In these sites the mean speed in simulator was equal to or greater than 94 km/h. For these configurations, the higher speeds recorded in simulator appeared to stem from the different risk perception on the simulated road as opposed to that on the real road. The study's results should be considered for driving speed behavior research, in which simulator equipment with similar features of the CRISS driving simulator is used.
本文报道了大学间道路安全研究中心(CRISS)交互式固定基座驾驶模拟器的一项验证研究,该研究旨在验证CRISS驾驶模拟器作为双车道乡村道路速度研究工具的有效性。在罗马附近一条双车道乡村道路上的11个具有不同线形配置的测量点记录了速度。在CRISS驾驶模拟器中再现了真实场景。40名驾驶员驾驶了模拟器。比较和统计分析结果确定了相对有效性,还表明在9个测量点获得了绝对有效性。仅在两种要求不高的配置中,模拟器中的速度显著高于实地记录的速度。在这些测量点,模拟器中的平均速度等于或大于94公里/小时。对于这些配置,模拟器中记录的较高速度似乎源于对模拟道路与真实道路不同的风险感知。对于使用具有CRISS驾驶模拟器类似特征的模拟器设备进行的驾驶速度行为研究,应考虑本研究结果。