Rainer Timothy H, Chan Cangel P Y, Leung Man Fai, Leung Wingman, Ip Margaret, Lee Nelson, Cautherley George W H, Graham Colin A, Fuchs Dietmar, Renneberg Reinhard
Accident and Emergency Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong.
J Infect. 2009 Feb;58(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
In this study we aimed to investigate the roles of neopterin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and the CRP to neopterin (C/N) ratio to differentiate bacterial from viral aetiology in patients with suspected acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Serum was taken from five hundred and sixty-one patients and used to measure neopterin and CRP levels. The primary outcome was bacterial or viral infection based on positive bacterial culture and positive viral serology. Patients were classified as either: group 1 with positive bacterial culture and mixed bacterial/viral growth; group 2 with virological aetiology, and group 3 with unknown microbiological aetiology.
The median of the C/N ratio was 10 times higher in patients with bacterial aetiology than with viral aetiology (12.5 vs 1.2mg/nmol; P<0.0001), and 42 times higher than those in healthy subjects (12.5 vs 0.3mg/nmol; P<0.0001). The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve for the C/N ratio was 0.840 (0.783-0.898; P<0.05). A cut-off value of "C/N ratio >3" for ruling in/out bacterial/viral infection yielded optimal sensitivity and specificity of 79.5% and 81.5% respectively. A sensitivity analysis performed on all patients (including unknown aetiology) with a cut-off value of "C/N ratio >3" yields a best-case scenario for ruling in/out bacterial/viral infection with sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 93.0%.
This study shows that CRP and neopterin have a role in differentiating bacterial from viral causes of ARTI, and the C/N ratio yields optimal differentiation in the ED setting.
在本研究中,我们旨在调查蝶呤、C反应蛋白(CRP)以及CRP与蝶呤的比值(C/N)在急诊科疑似急性呼吸道感染(ARTI)患者中区分细菌和病毒病因方面的作用。
采集了561例患者的血清,用于检测蝶呤和CRP水平。主要结局是基于细菌培养阳性和病毒血清学阳性确定的细菌或病毒感染。患者被分为以下几组:第1组为细菌培养阳性且有细菌/病毒混合生长;第2组为病毒病因;第3组为微生物病因不明。
细菌病因患者的C/N比值中位数比病毒病因患者高10倍(12.5对1.2mg/nmol;P<0.0001),比健康受试者高42倍(12.5对0.3mg/nmol;P<0.0001)。C/N比值的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.840(0.783 - 0.898;P<0.05)。“C/N比值>3”用于判断细菌/病毒感染的临界值,其敏感性和特异性分别为79.5%和81.5%。对所有患者(包括病因不明者)进行的敏感性分析,临界值为“C/N比值>3”时,判断细菌/病毒感染的最佳情况是敏感性为93.1%,特异性为93.0%。
本研究表明,CRP和蝶呤在区分ARTI的细菌和病毒病因方面发挥作用,且C/N比值在急诊科环境中能实现最佳区分。