• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[微阵列数据中检测差异表达的统计方法比较]

[Comparison of statistical methods for detecting differential expression in microarray data].

作者信息

Shan Wen-Juan, Tong Chun-Fa, Shi Ji-Sen

机构信息

The Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Gene Engineering of the State Administration and Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.

出版信息

Yi Chuan. 2008 Dec;30(12):1640-6. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2008.01640.

DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1005.2008.01640
PMID:19073583
Abstract

DNA microarray is a new tool in biotechnology, which allows simultaneously monitoring thousands of gene expression in cells. The goal of differential gene expression analysis is to detect genes with significant change of gene expression levels arising from experimental conditions. Although various statistical methods have been suggested to confirm differential gene expression, only a few studies compared performance of the statistical methods. This paper presented comparison of statistical methods for finding differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the microarray data. Using simulated and real datasets (Populus cDNA microarray data), we compared eight methods of identifying differential gene expression. The simulated datasets included four differential distributions (normal distribution, uniform distribution, c2 distribution, and exponential distribution). The results of simulated datasets analysis showed that the eight methods were more preferable with the microarray data of uniform distribution than normal distribution. They were not preferable with the c2 distribution and exponential distribution. Of these eight methods, SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays) and Wilcoxon rank sum test performed well in most cases. The results of real cDNA microarray data of Populus showed that there was much similarity of SAM, Samroc, and regression modeling approach. Wilcoxon rank sum test was different from them. Samroc and regression modeling approach were similar in the eight methods. For both simulated and real datasets, SAM, Samroc, and regression modeling approach performed better than other methods.

摘要

DNA微阵列是生物技术中的一种新工具,它能够同时监测细胞中数千个基因的表达。差异基因表达分析的目标是检测因实验条件而导致基因表达水平发生显著变化的基因。尽管已经提出了各种统计方法来确认差异基因表达,但只有少数研究比较了这些统计方法的性能。本文展示了从微阵列数据中寻找差异表达基因(DEG)的统计方法的比较。使用模拟数据集和真实数据集(杨树cDNA微阵列数据),我们比较了八种识别差异基因表达的方法。模拟数据集包括四种差异分布(正态分布、均匀分布、卡方分布和指数分布)。模拟数据集分析结果表明,对于均匀分布的微阵列数据,这八种方法比正态分布更适用。对于卡方分布和指数分布,它们并不适用。在这八种方法中,SAM(微阵列显著性分析)和威尔科克森秩和检验在大多数情况下表现良好。杨树真实cDNA微阵列数据的结果表明,SAM、Samroc和回归建模方法有很多相似之处。威尔科克森秩和检验与它们不同。在这八种方法中,Samroc和回归建模方法相似。对于模拟数据集和真实数据集,SAM、Samroc和回归建模方法的表现都优于其他方法。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of statistical methods for detecting differential expression in microarray data].[微阵列数据中检测差异表达的统计方法比较]
Yi Chuan. 2008 Dec;30(12):1640-6. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2008.01640.
2
Comparison of various statistical methods for identifying differential gene expression in replicated microarray data.用于识别重复微阵列数据中差异基因表达的各种统计方法的比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Feb;15(1):3-20. doi: 10.1191/0962280206sm423oa.
3
A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.一种从微阵列实验中寻找差异表达基因的统一框架。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Sep 18;8:347. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-347.
4
Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays.用于cDNA微阵列的正常均匀混合物差异基因表达检测
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 12;6:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-173.
5
A Survey and Comparative Study of Statistical Tests for Identifying Differential Expression from Microarray Data.用于从微阵列数据中识别差异表达的统计检验的调查与比较研究
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2014 Jan-Feb;11(1):95-115. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.147.
6
Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data.基于秩的方法作为用于生物微阵列数据分析的T统计量的非参数替代方法。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005 Oct;3(5):1171-89. doi: 10.1142/s0219720005001442.
7
The Baumgartner-Weiss-Schindler test for the detection of differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.用于在重复微阵列实验中检测差异表达基因的鲍姆加特纳-魏斯-辛德勒检验。
Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12;20(18):3553-64. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth442. Epub 2004 Jul 29.
8
BABAR: an R package to simplify the normalisation of common reference design microarray-based transcriptomic datasets.BABAR:一个 R 包,用于简化常见参考设计微阵列转录组数据集的标准化。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 3;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-73.
9
A comparison of statistical tests for detecting differential expression using Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays.使用Affymetrix寡核苷酸微阵列检测差异表达的统计检验方法比较。
OMICS. 2006 Winter;10(4):555-66. doi: 10.1089/omi.2006.10.555.
10
Robust gene selection methods using weighting schemes for microarray data analysis.用于微阵列数据分析的采用加权方案的稳健基因选择方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Sep 2;18(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1810-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Density distribution of gene expression profiles and evaluation of using maximal information coefficient to identify differentially expressed genes.基因表达谱密度分布及最大信息系数在差异表达基因识别中的应用评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0219551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219551. eCollection 2019.
2
Maximal information coefficient applied to differentially expressed genes identification: A feasibility study.应用最大信息系数进行差异表达基因鉴定:一项可行性研究。
Technol Health Care. 2019;27(S1):249-262. doi: 10.3233/THC-199024.
3
In-depth method assessments of differentially expressed protein detection for shotgun proteomics data with missing values.
深度方法评估用于具有缺失值的鸟枪法蛋白质组学数据的差异表达蛋白检测。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03650-8.