Dykes Patricia C, Kim Hyeon-eui, Goldsmith Denise M, Choi Jeeyae, Esumi Kumiko, Goldberg Howard S
Clinical Informatics Research & Development, Partners HealthCare, 93 Worcester St, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):238-46. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2956. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of the International Classification of Nursing Practice (1) (ICPN) Version 1.0 as a representational model for nursing assessment documentation.
To identify representational requirements of nursing assessments, the authors mapped key concepts and semantic relations extracted from standardized and local nursing admission assessment documentation forms/templates and inpatient admission assessment records to the ICNP. Next, they expanded the list of ICNP semantic relations with those obtained from the admission assessment forms/templates. The expanded ICNP semantic relations were then validated against the semantic relations identified from an additional set of admission assessment records and a set of 300 randomly selected North American Nursing Diagnosis Association defining characteristic phrases. The concept coverage of the ICNP was evaluated by mapping the concepts extracted from these sources to the ICNP concepts. The UMLS Methathesaurus was then used to map concepts without exact matches to other American Nursing Association (ANA) recognized terminologies.
The authors found that along with the 30 existing ICNP semantic relations, an additional 17 are required for the ICNP to function as a representational model for nursing assessment documentation. Eight hundred and five unique assessment concepts were extracted from all sources. Forty-three percent of these unique assessment concepts had exact matches in the ICNP. An additional 20% had matches in the ICNP classified as narrower, broader, or "other." Of the concepts without exact matches in the ICNP, 81% had exact matches found in other ANA recognized terminologies.
The broad concept coverage and the logic-based structure of the ICNP make it a flexible and robust standard. The ICNP provides a framework from which to capture and reuse atomic level data to facilitate evidence-based practice.
本研究旨在评估《国际护理实践分类(第1版)》(ICNP)作为护理评估文件代表性模型的充分性。
为确定护理评估的代表性要求,作者将从标准化和本地护理入院评估文件表格/模板以及住院患者入院评估记录中提取的关键概念和语义关系映射到ICNP。接下来,他们用从入院评估表格/模板中获得的语义关系扩展了ICNP语义关系列表。然后,针对从另一组入院评估记录以及一组随机抽取的300个北美护理诊断协会定义特征短语中确定的语义关系,对扩展后的ICNP语义关系进行验证。通过将从这些来源提取的概念映射到ICNP概念来评估ICNP的概念覆盖范围。然后使用统一医学语言系统词库将没有精确匹配项的概念映射到美国护理协会(ANA)认可的其他术语。
作者发现,除了ICNP现有的30种语义关系外,ICNP要作为护理评估文件的代表性模型还需要另外17种语义关系。从所有来源中提取了805个独特的评估概念。这些独特评估概念中有43%在ICNP中有精确匹配项。另外20%在ICNP中的匹配项被分类为更窄、更宽泛或“其他”。在ICNP中没有精确匹配项的概念中,81%在ANA认可的其他术语中有精确匹配项。
ICNP广泛的概念覆盖范围和基于逻辑的结构使其成为一个灵活且强大的标准。ICNP提供了一个框架,可从中捕获和重用原子级数据以促进循证实践。