Clinica Aparicio, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00130.x. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
The surgical protocol for zygomatic fixtures prescribes an intrasinus approach ideally maintaining the sinus membrane intact and the implant body inside the sinus while gaining access to the zygomatic bone. In the presence of a pronounced buccal concavity, the implant head has to be placed far from the alveolar crest in a palatal direction, which results in a bulky bridge construction.
The aim of this study was to report on the preliminary experiences with zygomatic implants placed with an extrasinus approach in order to have the implant head emerging at or near the top of the alveolar crest.
Twenty consecutive patients with pronounced buccal concavities in the edentulous posterior maxilla were treated with 104 regular and 36 zygomatic implants as support of fixed dental bridges. Sixteen patients were treated bilaterally and four patients were treated unilaterally. The zygomatic implants were inserted by using an extrasinus surgical approach with the implant body passing from the alveolar crest through the buccal concavity into the zygomatic bone. This enabled placement of the implant head at or close to the alveolar crest. The patients were followed from 36 to 48 months after occlusal loading with a mean follow-up of 41 months. The relation of the zygomatic implants to the crest was measured and compared with a control group of 20 patients treated with conventional placement of zygomatic implants.
No implants were lost during the study period. No pain, discomfort, or complications related to the extrasinus path of the zygomatic implants were recorded after the initial healing period and up to the 36th-month checkup. The zygomatic implants emerged, on average, 3.8 mm (SD 2.6) palatal to the top of the crest compared with 11.2 mm (SD 5.3) to the conventional technique.
The present 3-year clinical study shows that an extrasinus approach can be utilized when placing zygomatic implants in patients with pronounced buccal concavities in the posterior maxilla. Moreover, the technique results in an emergence of the zygomatic fixture close to the top of the crest, which is beneficial from a cleaning and patient-comfort point of view.
颧骨固定器的手术方案规定采用经窦内入路,理想情况下保持窦膜完整,种植体体部位于窦内,同时获得颧骨通路。在存在明显颊侧凹陷的情况下,种植体头部必须向腭侧远离牙槽嵴放置,这导致桥体体积较大。
本研究旨在报告经额外窦内入路植入颧骨种植体的初步经验,以便种植体头部位于或接近牙槽嵴顶。
20 例无牙后上颌骨颊侧明显凹陷的患者接受了 104 颗常规种植体和 36 颗颧骨种植体的治疗,作为固定义齿桥的支撑。16 例患者双侧治疗,4 例患者单侧治疗。颧骨种植体采用额外窦内手术入路植入,种植体体部从牙槽嵴经颊侧凹陷进入颧骨。这使得种植体头部能够位于或接近牙槽嵴顶。患者在负荷后 36 至 48 个月(平均 41 个月)接受随访。测量颧骨种植体与嵴的关系,并与 20 例接受常规颧骨种植体植入的对照组进行比较。
研究期间无种植体脱落。在初始愈合期和 36 个月检查后,没有与颧骨种植体额外窦内路径相关的疼痛、不适或并发症记录。颧骨种植体平均向腭侧突出 3.8 毫米(标准差 2.6),而常规技术为 11.2 毫米(标准差 5.3)。
本 3 年临床研究表明,在无牙后上颌骨颊侧明显凹陷的患者中,当植入颧骨种植体时,可以采用额外窦内入路。此外,该技术使颧骨固定器的突出接近嵴顶,从清洁和患者舒适度的角度来看是有益的。