• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颧骨解剖引导入路、颧骨眶底分类及ORIS标准——10年随访

The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria-A 10-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Zielinski Rafal, Okulski Jakub, Simka Wojciech, Kozakiewicz Marcin

机构信息

Stomatologia na Ksiezym Mlynie, 16D Tymienieckiego, 90-365 Lodz, Poland.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113st Zeromskiego, 90-001 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6681. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206681.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12206681
PMID:37892822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10607356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Presently, the management of patients with maxilla bone defects of the Cawood V or VI class is achieved using zygomatic or individual implants or through augmentation of the bone. For zygomatic implants, the ORIS criteria represent the most common factor in helping practitioners register success rates. The zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA)and zygomatic orbital floor (ZOF) are factors that are crucial to examining the anatomy of a particular patient before the procedure. The aim of thisarticle is to find the statistical relationship between the abovementioned terms and other factors.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients underwent zygomatic implant procedures in different configurations. The ORIS, ZAGA, and ZOF parameters were compared with other factors such as type of surgery, sex, age, and the anatomy of the zygomatic bone.

RESULTS

Most patients in this article were classified as ZAGA Class 2. The relationships between type of surgery and ZAGA classification, and ZAGA and sinus/maxilla zygomatic implant localization were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ZAGA and ZOF scales are practical and valuable factors that should be taken into account before surgery, whereas to date, criteria better than the ORIS scale have not been described in terms of the success of zygomatic implants. The ZOF scale might omit perforation of the orbit because this parameter warns a practitioner to be aware of the anatomy of the orbit.

摘要

背景

目前,Cawood V 或 VI 类上颌骨缺损患者的治疗可通过颧骨种植体或个体化种植体,或通过骨增量来实现。对于颧骨种植体,ORIS 标准是帮助医生记录成功率的最常见因素。颧骨解剖引导法(ZAGA)和颧骨眶底(ZOF)是术前检查特定患者解剖结构的关键因素。本文旨在找出上述术语与其他因素之间的统计关系。

方法

共有81例患者接受了不同配置的颧骨种植手术。将 ORIS、ZAGA 和 ZOF 参数与手术类型、性别、年龄和颧骨解剖结构等其他因素进行比较。

结果

本文中的大多数患者被归类为 ZAGA 2 类。手术类型与 ZAGA 分类之间以及 ZAGA 与鼻窦/上颌颧骨种植体定位之间的关系具有统计学意义。

结论

ZAGA 和 ZOF 量表是术前应考虑的实用且有价值的因素,而迄今为止,就颧骨种植体的成功率而言,尚未描述比 ORIS 量表更好的标准。ZOF 量表可能会忽略眼眶穿孔,因为该参数提醒医生注意眼眶的解剖结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/5d8e289c9e9c/jcm-12-06681-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/bc641e4843ea/jcm-12-06681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/2dbe1cfda3c8/jcm-12-06681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/3e2853f51b75/jcm-12-06681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/988fe8e874a6/jcm-12-06681-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/8854a6170fb3/jcm-12-06681-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/4636c81149fa/jcm-12-06681-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/cb7ee28c3003/jcm-12-06681-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/c12d19c28e2c/jcm-12-06681-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/d63802f5add7/jcm-12-06681-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/1be2151dfeaa/jcm-12-06681-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/ec08986c90f7/jcm-12-06681-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/1de2c8553e04/jcm-12-06681-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/4afab24067b9/jcm-12-06681-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/3ef1b774493c/jcm-12-06681-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/901e26e0f094/jcm-12-06681-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/5d8e289c9e9c/jcm-12-06681-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/bc641e4843ea/jcm-12-06681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/2dbe1cfda3c8/jcm-12-06681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/3e2853f51b75/jcm-12-06681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/988fe8e874a6/jcm-12-06681-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/8854a6170fb3/jcm-12-06681-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/4636c81149fa/jcm-12-06681-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/cb7ee28c3003/jcm-12-06681-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/c12d19c28e2c/jcm-12-06681-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/d63802f5add7/jcm-12-06681-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/1be2151dfeaa/jcm-12-06681-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/ec08986c90f7/jcm-12-06681-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/1de2c8553e04/jcm-12-06681-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/4afab24067b9/jcm-12-06681-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/3ef1b774493c/jcm-12-06681-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/901e26e0f094/jcm-12-06681-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23db/10607356/5d8e289c9e9c/jcm-12-06681-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria-A 10-Year Follow-Up.颧骨解剖引导入路、颧骨眶底分类及ORIS标准——10年随访
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6681. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206681.
2
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 3‑year follow‑up non‑interventional study.圆形和平面颧骨种植体:3 年随访非干预研究的效果。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 10;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00548-9.
3
Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.圆形和平坦型颧骨植入物:一项为期1年的非干预性研究随访后的有效性
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Apr 1;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00412-8.
4
A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patient based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey.基于颧骨解剖引导入路(ZAGA)的颧骨种植患者拟议分类:一项横断面调查
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Autumn;4(3):269-75.
5
Zygomatic implants placed using the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach versus the classical technique: a proposed system to report rhinosinusitis diagnosis.采用颧骨解剖引导法与传统技术植入颧骨种植体:一种报告鼻窦炎诊断的建议系统。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Oct;16(5):627-42. doi: 10.1111/cid.12047. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Identification of the Pathway and Appropriate Use of Four Zygomatic Implants in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional Study.在萎缩性上颌骨中识别四种颧骨种植体的途径和合理应用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):807-817. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8603.
7
Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach "Scarf Graft" for Prevention of Soft Tissue Dehiscence Around Zygomatic Implants: Technical Note.颧骨解剖引导式“Scarf 移植物”预防颧骨种植体周围软组织裂开:技术说明。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):e21-e26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8065.
8
A single-arm clinical trial investigating the feasibility of the zygomatic implant quad approach for Cawood and Howell Class 4 edentulous maxilla: An option for immediate loading.一项单臂临床试验,研究颧骨种植体 quad 入路治疗考沃德和豪厄尔 4 类无牙颌上颌骨的可行性:即刻负重的一种选择。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):800-808. doi: 10.1111/cid.13046. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.颧骨相关修复的 ORIS 成功标准:(再探讨)颧骨成功编码。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488.
10
Bone Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series.颧骨种植体周围的骨再生与软组织增强:回顾性病例系列
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 29;13(7):1577. doi: 10.3390/ma13071577.

引用本文的文献

1
Five-Year Comparative Study of Zygomatic and Subperiosteal Implants: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Treatment Strategies for Severe Maxillary Atrophy.颧骨种植体与骨膜下种植体的五年对比研究:严重上颌骨萎缩的临床结果、并发症及治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 21;14(3):661. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030661.
2
Ocular Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.颧骨种植牙的眼部并发症:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 22;16(8):e67535. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67535. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Finite Element Analysis of Subperiosteal Implants in Edentulism-On the Basis of the MaI Implant by Integra Implants.

本文引用的文献

1
Quad Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Survival and Complications.四象限颧骨种植体:一项关于存活率和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):21-29. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8417.
2
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.颧骨相关修复的 ORIS 成功标准:(再探讨)颧骨成功编码。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488.
3
Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications.
无牙颌骨膜下种植体的有限元分析——基于Integra种植体的Mai种植体
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;16(23):7466. doi: 10.3390/ma16237466.
不同表面改性植入物的长期临床结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S123-S136.
4
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):145-161.
5
Additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implants.增材制造的骨膜下颌骨植入物。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;46(7):938-940. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
5-year outcome of cross-arch prostheses supported by four immediately loaded zygomatic implants: A prospective case series.由四颗即刻负重颧骨种植体支持的跨牙弓修复体的5年随访结果:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):169-74.
7
Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code.颧骨种植体:适应证、技术和结果,以及颧骨成功评分。
Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):41-58. doi: 10.1111/prd.12038.
8
Extrasinus zygomatic implants: three year experience from a new surgical approach for patients with pronounced buccal concavities in the edentulous maxilla.颧骨种植体:一种新手术方法在无牙上颌骨颊侧明显凹陷患者中应用三年的经验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00130.x. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
9
A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study.一种使用上颌外固定种植体即刻功能化修复严重萎缩上颌骨的新方法:一项初步研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Nov;100(5):354-66. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60237-1.
10
The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla.颧骨种植体在严重吸收的上颌骨修复重建中的应用。
Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:162-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00259.x.