Suppr超能文献

改良版自我管理式澳大利亚积极生活方式身体活动调查问卷在中年女性样本中的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of a modified self-administered version of the Active Australia physical activity survey in a sample of mid-age women.

作者信息

Brown Wendy J, Burton Nicola W, Marshall Alison L, Miller Yvette D

机构信息

School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Dec;32(6):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00305.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the test-retest reliability and validity of a modified self-administered version of the Active Australia physical activity survey.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-nine mid-age women (54-59 years) completed a mailed physical activity questionnaire before recording daily pedometer step counts for seven consecutive days. A random subsample (n=44) also wore an accelerometer during this period. Participants then completed the physical activity questionnaire again. Spearman's rho and per cent agreement were used to assess test-retest reliability. Self-reported physical activity data (time 2) were compared with pedometer and accelerometer data using box plots and Spearman's correlations to assess validity.

RESULTS

Median time between surveys was 13 days. Median frequency and duration of moderate and vigorous physical activity were the same at both surveys, but median walking frequency was slightly higher at time 2 than time 1. Reliability coefficients for frequency/time in each domain of physical activity ranged from 0.56-0.64 and per cent agreement scores ranged from 40% to 65% for the physical activity categories; agreement was 76% for 'meeting guidelines'. Correlations (p) between self-reported physical activity and 1) weekly pedometer steps and 2) accelerometer data for duration of at least moderate intensity physical activity were 0.43 and 0.52 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement properties of this modified self-administered physical activity survey are similar to those reported for the original computer assisted telephone interview survey.

IMPLICATIONS

This modified version of the Active Australia survey is suitable for use in self-administered format.

摘要

目的

评估改良的主动澳大利亚体力活动调查问卷自填式版本的重测信度和效度。

方法

159名中年女性(54 - 59岁)在连续7天记录每日计步器步数之前,完成了一份邮寄的体力活动问卷。在此期间,一个随机子样本(n = 44)还佩戴了加速度计。参与者随后再次完成了体力活动问卷。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和一致性百分比来评估重测信度。使用箱线图和斯皮尔曼相关性将自我报告的体力活动数据(第二次)与计步器和加速度计数据进行比较,以评估效度。

结果

两次调查之间的中位时间为13天。两次调查中,中度和剧烈体力活动的中位频率和持续时间相同,但第二次的中位步行频率略高于第一次。体力活动各领域频率/时间的信度系数范围为0.56 - 0.64,体力活动类别的一致性百分比得分范围为40%至65%;“符合指南”的一致性为76%。自我报告的体力活动与1)每周计步器步数以及2)至少中度强度体力活动持续时间的加速度计数据之间的相关性(p值)分别为0.43和0.52。

结论

这种改良的自填式体力活动调查的测量特性与原始计算机辅助电话访谈调查所报告的相似。

启示

主动澳大利亚调查的这种改良版本适用于自填式形式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验