Nagasawa Naoki, Yamakado Koichiro, Yamada Tomomi, Nakanishi Satoshi, Ito Morihiro, Suzawa Naohisa, Kitano Tokio, Takeda Kan
Department of Radiology, Mie University School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Nucl Med Commun. 2009 Feb;30(2):155-9. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328314b8a8.
The three-dimensional stereotactic region of interest template (3DSRT) is computer software, which enables the automatic measurement of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). This study was undertaken to compare the rCBF values obtained using the 3DSRT method and the conventional manual tracing method.
Twelve patients with normal brains who underwent technetium-99m L,L-ethyl cysteinate dimer single-photon emission computed tomography studies were enrolled in this study. The brains were divided into 12 segments in each hemisphere, and rCBF was measured in each segment. The regions of interest were automatically placed in the segments in the 3DSRT method and were manually traced by five nuclear medicine technicians in the manual tracing method. The rCBF values obtained were compared between the two methods. Interoperator reliability was evaluated in the manual tracing method.
The rCBF values were significantly higher in the manual tracing method than in the 3DSRT method in all segments except for the angular segment. A good correlation was seen between the two methods in the rCBF values in 10 (83.3%) of the 12 brain segments (range of coefficient of determinations: 0.73-0.94). A poor correlation, however, was seen in the pericallosal (0.50) and hippocampal (0.53) segments. Interoperator reliability was lower in these two segments than in the other segments in the manual tracing method.
Although the rCBF values obtained using the manual tracing method and the 3DSRT method show good correlation in most segments, care is required when comparing the results for the pericallosal and hippocampal segments.
三维立体定向感兴趣区模板(3DSRT)是一种计算机软件,可实现局部脑血流量(rCBF)的自动测量。本研究旨在比较使用3DSRT方法和传统手动描绘法获得的rCBF值。
本研究纳入了12例接受锝-99m L,L-半胱氨酸二聚体单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究的脑功能正常患者。将大脑的每个半球分为12个节段,并测量每个节段的rCBF。在3DSRT方法中,感兴趣区自动放置在各节段中;在手动描绘法中,由五名核医学技术人员手动描绘感兴趣区。比较两种方法获得的rCBF值。对手动描绘法进行了操作者间可靠性评估。
除角回节段外,在所有节段中,手动描绘法获得的rCBF值均显著高于3DSRT方法。在12个脑节段中的10个(83.3%)节段中,两种方法获得的rCBF值具有良好的相关性(决定系数范围:0.73 - 0.94)。然而,在胼胝体(0.50)和海马(0.53)节段中相关性较差。在手动描绘法中,这两个节段的操作者间可靠性低于其他节段。
虽然手动描绘法和3DSRT方法获得的rCBF值在大多数节段中显示出良好的相关性,但在比较胼胝体和海马节段的结果时需要谨慎。