Suppr超能文献

抗α- fodrin抗体检测对干燥综合征的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析

[Diagnostic value of anti-alpha-fodrin antibody testing for Sjögren's syndrome: a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Huang Qing-shui, LE Ai-ping, Luo Zhong-qin, Li Jun-ming, Wang Wen-qiang, Ju Bei-hua, Wan La-gen

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Nov 18;88(42):2971-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-alpha-fodrin antibody for Sjögren's syndrome (SS).

METHODS

Qualified literatures on evaluation of anti-alpha-fodrin antibody in diagnosis of SS in English and Chinese published between January 1997 and December 2007 were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, etc. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study with the tool QUADAS (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies). Statistical analysis was performed by employing MATLAB, Review Manager 4.2 and Meta-Disc1.4. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study and Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen literatures were included at last. After testing the heterogeneity of the included articles, proper effect model was selected to calculate the pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval: for anti-alpha-fodrin antibody IgG, the sensitivity was 0.40 [95%CI (0.37-0.43)] and the specificity was 0.82 [95%CI (0.79-0.84)], the area under the curve (AUC) of SROC was 0.8029 (SE=0.0580). Eight studies tested anti-alpha-fodrin antibody IgA, the pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval were 0.34 [95%CI (0.30-0.38)] and 0.83 [95%CI (0.79-0.86)] respectively, the AUC of SROC was 0.6374 (SE=0.1841), the synthesis data all showed heterogeneity. The subgroups were analyzed to identify the sources of heterogeneity according to age, race, assay method, agent source, diagnostic criteria, and country. There was homogeneity among the 4 studies from China, and the 6 studies from Japan, the AUC of SROC were 0.7343 (SE=0.0448) and 0.9273 (SE=0.0394), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic criteria, agent source, assay method, age, race, and country are the important sources of heterogeneity. Anti-alpha-fodrin antibodies IgG and IgA have relatively low pooled sensitivity and relatively high pooled specificity. Negative anti-alpha-fodrin antibody has not important value in excluding SS, but positive anti-alpha-fodrin antibody may be a useful parameter in clinical diagnosis of SS.

摘要

目的

评估抗α- fodrin抗体对干燥综合征(SS)的诊断准确性。

方法

从Cochrane图书馆、Medline、Embase和中国知网(CNKI)数据库等中检索1997年1月至2007年12月期间发表的有关抗α- fodrin抗体评估SS诊断的中英文合格文献。两名评价者使用QUADAS(诊断准确性研究的质量评估)工具独立评估每项研究的方法学质量。采用MATLAB、Review Manager 4.2和Meta-Disc1.4进行统计分析。对每项研究报告的敏感性和特异性进行Meta分析,并绘制汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。

结果

最终纳入18篇文献。在检验纳入文章的异质性后,选择合适的效应模型计算合并加权敏感性和特异性及其95%置信区间:对于抗α- fodrin抗体IgG,敏感性为0.40 [95%CI(0.37 - 0.43)],特异性为0.82 [95%CI(0.79 - 0.84)],SROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.8029(SE = 0.0580)。8项研究检测了抗α- fodrin抗体IgA,其合并加权敏感性和特异性及其95%置信区间分别为0.34 [95%CI(0.30 - 0.38)]和0.83 [95%CI(0.79 - 0.86)],SROC曲线下面积为0.6374(SE = 0.1841),综合数据均显示存在异质性。根据年龄、种族、检测方法、试剂来源、诊断标准和国家对亚组进行分析以确定异质性来源。来自中国的4项研究和来自日本的6项研究存在同质性,SROC曲线下面积分别为0.7343(SE = 0.0448)和0.9273(SE = 0.0394)。

结论

诊断标准、试剂来源、检测方法、年龄、种族和国家是异质性的重要来源。抗α- fodrin抗体IgG和IgA的合并敏感性相对较低,合并特异性相对较高。抗α- fodrin抗体阴性在排除SS方面无重要价值,但抗α- fodrin抗体阳性可能是SS临床诊断的一个有用参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验