• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生部门的不孕服务优先级较低:巴西案例研究。

Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study.

机构信息

Center for Research in Reproductive Health of Campinas (CEMICAMP), Caixa Postal 6181, 13084-971 Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):430-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep405. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep405
PMID:19920065
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In view of the lack of information on availability of public sector infertility services and in order to contribute to the debate on access to these services, we assessed the availability of public sector infertility services, including assisted reproduction technology (ART), in Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study with telephone interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire with Health Secretariats' authorities from the 26 States, the Federal District, 26 Municipal state capitals and another 16 cities with more than 500 000 inhabitants. Also, directors of 26 referral centres and teaching hospitals provide ART procedures supported by the state or university teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

Authorities from 24/26 State Secretariats and the Federal District, from 39/42 cities and 26 directors of referral centres and teaching hospitals offering government-funded infertility care and ART were interviewed. In 19/25 states (76%) and 26/39 cities (66.7%), no infertility treatment was available free of charge. The most common reason for lack of services at the state and municipal levels was 'lack of any political decision to implement them', followed by 'lack of human and financial resources'. When ART was available, barriers to access included the fact that patients needed to purchase medication and the more than 1-year waiting list for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of political commitment results in inequity in the access of low-income couples in Brazil to infertility treatment, including ART.

摘要

背景

鉴于公共部门不孕服务的提供情况信息匮乏,为了促进对这些服务获取途径的讨论,我们评估了巴西公共部门不孕服务(包括辅助生殖技术)的提供情况。

材料和方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究,通过电话访谈,使用半结构化问卷对 26 个州、联邦区、26 个州首府和另外 16 个拥有 50 多万居民的城市的卫生部门当局进行了调查。此外,26 个转诊中心和教学医院的主任提供了由州或大学教学医院支持的辅助生殖技术程序。

结果

采访了 24/26 个州卫生部门和联邦区、39/42 个城市以及 26 个提供政府资助的不孕治疗和辅助生殖技术的转诊中心和教学医院主任。在 19/25 个州(76%)和 26/39 个城市(66.7%)中,没有免费的不孕治疗。州和市级服务缺乏的最常见原因是“缺乏实施这些服务的任何政治决策”,其次是“缺乏人力和财力资源”。当提供辅助生殖技术时,获得服务的障碍包括患者需要购买药物和治疗需要等待 1 年以上。

结论

缺乏政治承诺导致巴西低收入夫妇在获得不孕治疗,包括辅助生殖技术方面存在不平等。

相似文献

1
Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study.公共卫生部门的不孕服务优先级较低:巴西案例研究。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):430-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep405. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
2
Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study.巴西低收入人群获得辅助生殖技术的机会不平等:一项定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2054-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der158. Epub 2011 May 25.
3
Access of people living with HIV to infertility services: perspective of Brazilian healthcare professionals.艾滋病毒感染者获得不孕不育服务的情况:巴西医疗保健专业人员的观点。
AIDS Care. 2011 Oct;23(10):1329-35. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.564113. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
4
Barriers to access to infertility care and assisted reproductive technology within the public health sector in Brazil.巴西公共卫生部门中获得不孕不育治疗和辅助生殖技术的障碍。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(4):221-6.
5
Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术中心的准入
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):745-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
6
The public sector's role in infertility management in India.印度公共部门在不孕不育治疗中的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):108-15. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn053. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
7
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.丹麦的不孕症与辅助生殖。流行病学及心理社会后果。
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
8
Coverage and current practice patterns regarding assisted reproduction techniques.辅助生殖技术的覆盖范围及当前实践模式。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
9
Assisted reproductive technologies in India: the views of practitioners.印度的辅助生殖技术:从业者的观点。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009;12(3):144-52. doi: 10.1080/14647270903212156.
10
Who should pay for assisted reproductive techniques? Answers from patients, professionals and the general public in Germany.谁应该为辅助生殖技术付费?来自德国的患者、专业人士和公众的答案。
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1225-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq056. Epub 2010 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Trends in the Burden of Disease for Male Infertility from 1990 to 2021 in the BRICS.1990年至2021年金砖国家男性不育疾病负担的时间趋势
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 May 24;18:1721-1733. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S506211. eCollection 2025.
2
New choreographies of inequalities in reproduction: an overview of assisted reproduction market.生殖领域不平等现象的新表现形式:辅助生殖市场概述
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Sep 28;27(4):739-46. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230026.
3
Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
低收入和中等收入国家患者辅助生殖技术的财务成本:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 1;2023(2):hoad007. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad007. eCollection 2023.
4
The search for assisted reproduction: profile of patients seen in the fertility outpatient clinic of a public hospital.辅助生殖的探索:公立医院生育门诊患者的特征。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 Jul 14;24(3):305-309. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200008.
5
Cost and affordability of non-communicable disease screening, diagnosis and treatment in Kenya: Patient payments in the private and public sectors.肯尼亚非传染性疾病筛查、诊断和治疗的成本及可负担性:私营和公共部门的患者支付情况
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190113. eCollection 2018.
6
Practices and ethical concerns regarding preimplantation diagnosis. Who regulates preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Brazil?关于植入前诊断的实践与伦理问题。巴西由谁来监管植入前基因诊断?
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Jan;48(1):25-33. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20144083. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
7
A South African public-private partnership HIV treatment model: viability and success factors.一种南非公私合作的艾滋病毒治疗模式:可行性与成功因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10):e110635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110635. eCollection 2014.
8
Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings.资源匮乏地区的不孕不育治疗与新生殖技术的引入
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Sep 8;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-87.
9
Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights.低成本体外受精:当前的见解。
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 21;6:817-27. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S51288. eCollection 2014.
10
Infertility in public health: the case of Norway.公共卫生领域的不孕症:以挪威为例。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(3):177-81.