• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国辅助生殖技术医疗保健的地理可及性:一项基于人群的横断面研究。

Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Harris John A, Menke Marie N, Haefner Jessica K, Moniz Michelle H, Perumalswami Chithra R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):1023-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101
PMID:28314508
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the geographic distribution of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics and the number of ART clinics within U.S. Census metropolitan areas and to estimate the number of reproductive-age women who have geographic access to ART services in the United States.

DESIGN

A population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): None.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of U.S. reproductive-age women living in areas with no ART clinic, a single ART clinic, or more than one ART clinic.

RESULT(S): There were 510 ART clinics in the United States in 2009-2013. Multiple ART clinics were present in 76 metropolitan areas (median population of 1.45 million people), where a total of 442 clinics were located. A single ART clinic was present in 68 metropolitan areas (median population of 454,000 people). Among U.S. reproductive-age women in 2010, 38.1 million (60.4% of the U.S. population) lived in an area with multiple ART clinics, 6.8 million (10.8% of the U.S. population) lived in an area with a single clinic, and 18.2 million (28.8% of the U.S. population) lived in an area (metropolitan and nonmetropolitan) with no ART clinics.

CONCLUSION(S): Nearby geographic access to ART services is limited or absent for more than 25 million reproductive-age women (39.6% of the U.S. population) in the United States. This population estimate should spur continued policy and technological progress to increase access to ART services.

摘要

目的

评估美国辅助生殖技术(ART)诊所的地理分布情况、美国人口普查大都市区内ART诊所的数量,并估算美国有机会获得ART服务的育龄妇女数量。

设计

基于人群的横断面研究。

地点

不适用。

患者

无。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

居住在没有ART诊所、有一家ART诊所或有多家ART诊所地区的美国育龄妇女数量。

结果

2009 - 2013年美国有510家ART诊所。76个大都市区(中位人口为145万人)设有多家ART诊所,共分布有442家诊所。68个大都市区(中位人口为45.4万人)设有一家ART诊所。2010年,美国育龄妇女中,3810万(占美国人口的60.4%)居住在有多家ART诊所的地区,680万(占美国人口的10.8%)居住在有一家诊所的地区,1820万(占美国人口的28.8%)居住在没有ART诊所的地区(包括大都市区和非大都市区)。

结论

在美国,超过2500万育龄妇女(占美国人口的39.6%)无法便捷地获得ART服务,或者附近根本没有ART服务。这一人口估计应促使政策和技术持续进步,以增加ART服务的可及性。

相似文献

1
Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.美国辅助生殖技术医疗保健的地理可及性:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):1023-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
2
Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术中心的准入
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):745-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
3
Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment.住宅与生育诊所的距离与女性接受辅助生殖技术(ART)和宫腔内人工授精(IUI)治疗的可能性独立相关。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2662-2671. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac205.
4
Supply of and demand for assisted reproductive technologies in the United States: clinic- and population-based data, 1995-2010.1995 - 2010年美国辅助生殖技术的供需情况:基于诊所和人群的数据
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
Cross-border reproductive care in North America: a pilot study testing a prospective data collection program for in vitro fertilization clinics in Canada and the United States.北美跨境生殖护理:一项针对加拿大和美国体外受精诊所的前瞻性数据收集项目的试点研究。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):786-790. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.048. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
6
Access to fertility services for lesbian women in Canada.加拿大女同性恋者获取生育服务的途径。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1077-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.048. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
7
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.
8
Impact of satellite clinics on geographic access to assisted reproductive technology services in the United States.卫星诊所对美国辅助生殖技术服务地理可及性的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08281-y.
9
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
10
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between the dietary inflammatory index and infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.饮食炎症指数与不孕症之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 26;12:1599782. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1599782. eCollection 2025.
2
The Association Between Infertility Treatment and Birth Outcomes for Nulliparous Persons Who Gave Birth 35 Years and Older: Findings from 2022 National Vital Statistics System Natality Data.35岁及以上初产妇的不孕症治疗与分娩结局之间的关联:来自2022年国家生命统计系统出生数据的发现
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04174-8.
3
The Contribution of Precision Nutrition Intervention in Subfertile Couples.
精准营养干预对不育夫妇的作用
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 30;17(1):103. doi: 10.3390/nu17010103.
4
Air pollution exposure in vitrified oocyte donors and male recipient partners in relation to fertilization and embryo quality.玻璃化卵母细胞供体和男性受方伴侣的空气污染暴露与受精和胚胎质量的关系。
Environ Int. 2024 Nov;193:109147. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109147. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
5
Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.在一个对不孕症有全面规定的州,按种族和民族划分的不孕症服务利用的决定因素。
Fertil Steril. 2025 Apr;123(4):709-717. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
6
Which obstetrics-gynecology residency programs are training future reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows? An observational study.哪些妇产科住院医师培训项目正在培养未来的生殖内分泌与不孕症专科住院医师?一项观察性研究。
F S Rep. 2024 Jul 22;5(3):259-262. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.07.003. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州癌症青少年和年轻女性获得生育咨询的地理途径。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1194-1202. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0482.
8
Geographic Disparities in Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology Centers in China: Spatial-Statistical Study.中国辅助生殖技术中心获取的地理差异:空间统计研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 12;10:e55418. doi: 10.2196/55418.
9
REI clinics and fellowship training-a national snapshot to improve access to reproductive care.REI 诊所和奖学金培训——改善生殖保健服务可及性的全国性快照。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Sep;40(9):2101-2108. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02868-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Patient perspectives of telehealth for fertility care: a national survey.患者对生育保健远程医疗的看法:一项全国性调查。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1369-1376. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02811-1. Epub 2023 Apr 28.