Suppr超能文献

低压和中压紫外线灯的比较:城市污水处理厂二级出水大肠杆菌和总大肠菌群的光复活作用

Comparison of low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet lamps: Photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and total coliforms in secondary effluents of municipal wastewater treatment plants.

作者信息

Guo Meiting, Hu Hongying, Bolton James R, El-Din Mohamed Gamal

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Qinghua-Yuan, Haidian-Qu, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Water Res. 2009 Feb;43(3):815-21. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.028. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

Abstract

It has been reported that Medium-Pressure (MP) ultraviolet (UV) lamps have an advantage over low-pressure (LP) lamps for water disinfection in terms of the photoreactivation of pure cultured bacteria. However, few studies have investigated the behavior of microorganisms in wastewater. Hence, in this study, the degree of photoreactivation, after UV exposure using both LP and MP lamps, in municipal wastewater samples was examined under a variety of conditions. Pure cultured Escherichia coli was also used to provide a comparison with previous studies. E. coli was found to undergo photoreactivation after both LP and MP exposure. The Colony Forming Ability (CFA) ratios were 0.60 and 0.32, and the percentage of photoreactivation was 50% and 20%, respectively, for LP and MP lamps with a germicidal UV dose of 5 mJ/cm2. However, the advantage of the MP lamp was diminished for larger UV doses, since no photoreactivation was detected when the UV dose was 15 mJ/cm2 for either LP or MP lamps. The microorganisms present in wastewater showed similar results to those of E. coli, however, no significant difference was found between the use of either a LP or a MP lamp. Also, when a UV dose of 40 mJ/cm2 was applied, the percentage photoreactivation was less than 1%, no matter which type of lamp was used. From this work, it is concluded that the selection of the type of UV lamp for wastewater treatment plants, as regards photoreactivation of total coliforms, is not critical as long as the applied germicidal UV dose is greater than 40 mJ/cm2.

摘要

据报道,中压(MP)紫外线(UV)灯在纯培养细菌的光复活方面比低压(LP)灯在水消毒方面具有优势。然而,很少有研究调查废水中微生物的行为。因此,在本研究中,在各种条件下检查了使用LP和MP灯进行紫外线照射后城市废水样本中的光复活程度。还使用纯培养的大肠杆菌与先前的研究进行比较。发现大肠杆菌在LP和MP照射后都会发生光复活。对于杀菌紫外线剂量为5 mJ/cm²的LP和MP灯,菌落形成能力(CFA)比率分别为0.60和0.32,光复活百分比分别为50%和20%。然而,对于较大的紫外线剂量,MP灯的优势减弱,因为当LP或MP灯的紫外线剂量为15 mJ/cm²时未检测到光复活。废水中存在的微生物显示出与大肠杆菌相似的结果,然而,使用LP灯或MP灯之间没有发现显著差异。此外,当施加40 mJ/cm²的紫外线剂量时,无论使用哪种类型的灯,光复活百分比均小于1%。从这项工作可以得出结论,对于污水处理厂紫外线灯类型的选择,就总大肠菌群的光复活而言,只要施加的杀菌紫外线剂量大于40 mJ/cm²就不是关键因素。

相似文献

7
Effect of pre- and post-UV disinfection conditions on photoreactivation of fecal coliforms in wastewater effluents.
Water Res. 2010 May;44(9):2885-93. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivity of Bacteria, Protozoa, Viruses, and Other Microorganisms to Ultraviolet Radiation.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2021 Aug 20;126:126021. doi: 10.6028/jres.126.021. eCollection 2021.
2
Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 1;13:942708. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.942708. eCollection 2022.
3
Disinfection of Wastewater by UV-Based Treatment for Reuse in a Circular Economy Perspective. Where Are We at?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 24;18(1):77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010077.
5
Evaluating UV-C LED disinfection performance and investigating potential dual-wavelength synergy.
Water Res. 2017 Feb 1;109:207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验