• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[曼彻斯特分诊系统。跨学科急诊科的流程优化]

[Manchester triage system. Process optimization in the interdisciplinary emergency department].

作者信息

Schellein O, Ludwig-Pistor F, Bremerich D H

机构信息

Abteilung für Anästhesie und Operative Intensivmedizin, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus Limburg, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Auf dem Schafsberg, 65549 Limburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2009 Feb;58(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1477-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-008-1477-9
PMID:19082988
Abstract

After formal reorganization of the emergency department of the St. Vincenz Krankenhauses, Limburg, a change in the patient admission process was accomplished. The aim was to improve patient satisfaction and treatment quality by optimizing personnel, diagnostic and spatial resources. In particular the focus was on shifting the initial assessment of treatment priority to the nursing staff. A structured primary assessment triage system (Manchester triage system, MTS) was implemented by which a symptom-based prioritization of patients into five categories can be achieved. In parallel with the development and installation of a software program linking computer-based MTS classifications to defined clinical pathways and diagnostic procedures, a standardized, documented assessment of treatment priority could be achieved in 95% of emergency patients. On average the time between patients' first contact with the nursing staff and treatment by a physician was shortened from 15 to 10 min. Using this standardized, documented and user-independent triage system, medical as well as forensic safety of the admission process in an emergency department was improved.

摘要

在林堡的圣维森茨医院急诊科进行正式重组后,患者入院流程发生了变化。目的是通过优化人员、诊断和空间资源来提高患者满意度和治疗质量。特别强调的是将治疗优先级的初步评估工作交给护理人员。实施了结构化的初级评估分诊系统(曼彻斯特分诊系统,MTS),通过该系统可根据症状将患者分为五类确定优先级。在开发并安装了一个将基于计算机的MTS分类与既定临床路径和诊断程序相连接的软件程序的同时,95%的急诊患者能够实现对治疗优先级的标准化、有记录的评估。患者从首次与护理人员接触到由医生进行治疗的平均时间从15分钟缩短至10分钟。使用这种标准化、有记录且独立于用户的分诊系统,急诊科入院流程的医疗及法医安全性得到了提高。

相似文献

1
[Manchester triage system. Process optimization in the interdisciplinary emergency department].[曼彻斯特分诊系统。跨学科急诊科的流程优化]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Feb;58(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1477-9.
2
Optimizing triage and hospitalization in adult general medical emergency patients: the triage project.优化成人综合医学急诊患者的分诊和住院流程:分诊项目。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 4;13:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-12.
3
Computerized algorithm-directed triage in the emergency department.急诊科的计算机化算法指导分诊
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Feb;18(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80102-7.
4
Performance of the Manchester Triage System in Adult Medical Emergency Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在成人医疗急诊患者中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):678-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Nurse Staffing Calculation in the Emergency Department - Performance-Oriented Calculation Based on the Manchester Triage System at the University Hospital Bonn.波恩大学医院急诊科护士人员配置计算——基于曼彻斯特分诊系统的以绩效为导向的计算方法
PLoS One. 2016 May 3;11(5):e0154344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154344. eCollection 2016.
6
#Triage - Formal emergency department triage tools are inefficient, unfair, and they waste time and resources.# 分诊——正式的急诊科分诊工具效率低下、不公平,还浪费时间和资源。
CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):665-670. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.434.
7
Patient characteristics, triage utilisation, level of care, and outcomes in an unselected adult patient population seen by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.一项前瞻性观察研究:在接受紧急医疗服务的未选择的成年患者人群中,患者特征、分诊利用、护理水平和结局。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-0302-x.
8
A comparison of emergency triage scales in triaging poisoned patients.中毒患者分诊中急诊分诊量表的比较。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Nov;17(4):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
9
[Interdisciplinary emergency room - key to success?].[跨学科急诊室——成功的关键?]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Sep;109(6):422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0297-0. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
10
Safety of the Manchester Triage System to Detect Critically Ill Children at the Emergency Department.曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科检测重症儿童的安全性。
J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:232-237.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.068. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Emergencies in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: An Analysis of Patients Presenting to Emergency Rooms in South-West Germany: A Bi-Center Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情与耳鼻咽喉头颈外科急症:对德国西南部急诊室就诊患者的分析:一项双中心研究
Diseases. 2024 Aug 22;12(8):194. doi: 10.3390/diseases12080194.
2
Refusal of patients: care for people without health insurance in German emergency departments.患者拒绝:德国急诊部门为没有健康保险的人提供护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 16;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01059-3.
3
Public perceptions of urgency of severe cases of COVID-19 and inflammatory gastrointestinal disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.荷兰综合急诊科患者群体中曼彻斯特分诊系统的可靠性和有效性:一项模拟研究的结果
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):431-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.055228.
2
The Manchester Triage System in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中的曼彻斯特分诊系统。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2008 Feb;27(2):205-16.
3
[Organizational faults in clinical and medical standards in structural and organizational changes. New recommendations of the German Society for Medical Standards]].
公众对 COVID-19 严重病例和炎症性胃肠道疾病紧迫性的认知。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0273000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273000. eCollection 2022.
4
Intended healthcare utilisation in cases of severe COVID-19 and inflammatory gastrointestinal disease: results of a population survey with vignettes.严重 COVID-19 和炎症性胃肠道疾病病例中的预期医疗保健利用:基于病例简述的人群调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 31;12(3):e057644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057644.
5
Nonurgent Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department before and during the First Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情首个高峰之前及期间儿科急诊科的非紧急就诊情况
Int J Pediatr. 2022 Feb 28;2022:7580546. doi: 10.1155/2022/7580546. eCollection 2022.
6
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Acute Medication Poisoning in Adults in Emergency Department of Our Hospital from 2016 to 2019 and Observation of Curative Effect of Optimizing Emergency Procedures.我院急诊科2016年至2019年成人急性药物中毒影响因素分析及优化急诊流程疗效观察
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Sep 30;2021:5265804. doi: 10.1155/2021/5265804. eCollection 2021.
7
Suitability of the German version of the Manchester Triage System to redirect emergency department patients to general practitioner care: a prospective cohort study.德国版曼彻斯特分诊系统将急诊科患者转至全科医生护理的适宜性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 6;9(5):e024896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024896.
8
Triage for out-of-hours primary care calls: a reliability study of a new French-language algorithm, the SALOMON rule.非工作时间初级保健电话分诊:一种新的法语算法 SALOMON 规则的可靠性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):227-232. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608057. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Changes in Relative Importance of the 5-Level Triage System, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, for the Disposition of Emergency Patients Induced by Forced Reduction in Its Level Number: a Multi-Center Registry-based Retrospective Cohort Study.5 级分诊系统、韩国分诊和 acuity 量表的相对重要性变化对其级别数量强制减少导致的急诊患者处置的影响:一项基于多中心登记的回顾性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 15;34(14):e114. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e114.
10
Patients Attending Emergency Departments.急诊患者。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Sep 29;114(39):645-652. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0645.
[结构与组织变革中临床及医学标准的组织缺陷。德国医学标准协会的新建议]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(8):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.08.033.
4
Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale.观察者间使用加拿大急诊分诊和 acuity 量表的一致性。
CJEM. 2002 Jan;4(1):16-22. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500006023.
5
Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial.两种五级分诊和严重度评估量表的观察者间可靠性评估:一项随机对照试验。
CJEM. 2004 Jul;6(4):240-5. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500009192.
6
Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care.曼彻斯特分诊系统在儿科急诊护理中的有效性。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Dec;23(12):906-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.038877.
7
Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force.五级分诊:美国急诊医师学会/急诊护士协会五级分诊特别工作组的报告
J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Feb;31(1):39-50; quiz 118. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2004.11.002.
8
Emergency department triage: why we need a research agenda.急诊科分诊:为何我们需要一个研究议程。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;44(5):524-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.432.
9
Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3.《急诊严重程度指数第3版》评分的可靠性与有效性
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):59-65. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.013.
10
Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain.检测胸痛高危患者。
Emerg Nurse. 2003 Sep;11(5):19-21. doi: 10.7748/en2003.09.11.5.19.c1131.