• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测胸痛高危患者。

Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain.

作者信息

Speake Douglas, Teece Stewart, Mackway-Jones Kevin

机构信息

Manchester Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

Emerg Nurse. 2003 Sep;11(5):19-21. doi: 10.7748/en2003.09.11.5.19.c1131.

DOI:10.7748/en2003.09.11.5.19.c1131
PMID:14533295
Abstract

AIM

To assess the ability of nurses using the Manchester Triage System (MTS) to identify those patients with chest pain requiring immediate electrocardiogram (ECG) and physician assessment within ten minutes.

METHOD

A four-week prospective cohort of all patients attending with chest pain compared detection of risk by nurses using the MTS to that of researchers using best available evidence-based prognostic indicators from history.

RESULTS

The study of 167 patients showed that nurses using MTS had a sensitivity of 86.8 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI), 78.4-92.3 per cent) and a specificity of 72.4 per cent (95 per cent CI, 61.4-81.2 per cent) when identifying high risk cardiac chest pain.

CONCLUSION

Nurses using the MTS are a sensitive tool for identifying high risk cardiac chest pain but further work is required to assess whether additional training can improve sensitivity.

摘要

目的

评估使用曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)的护士识别那些需要在十分钟内进行心电图(ECG)检查和医生评估的胸痛患者的能力。

方法

对所有因胸痛前来就诊的患者进行为期四周的前瞻性队列研究,将使用MTS的护士对风险的检测与使用基于病史的最佳循证预后指标的研究人员的检测进行比较。

结果

对167名患者的研究表明,使用MTS的护士在识别高危心脏性胸痛时,灵敏度为86.8%(95%置信区间(CI),78.4 - 92.3%),特异度为72.4%(95%CI,61.4 - 81.2%)。

结论

使用MTS的护士是识别高危心脏性胸痛的一种灵敏工具,但需要进一步开展工作来评估额外培训是否能提高灵敏度。

相似文献

1
Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain.检测胸痛高危患者。
Emerg Nurse. 2003 Sep;11(5):19-21. doi: 10.7748/en2003.09.11.5.19.c1131.
2
Effectiveness of using the front door score to enhance the chest pain triage accuracy of emergency nurse triage decisions.利用前门评分提高急诊护士分诊决策对胸痛分诊准确性的效果。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):E55-64. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318277c5ed.
3
Expediting the early hospital care of the adult patient with nontraumatic chest pain: impact of a modified ED triage protocol.加快成年非创伤性胸痛患者的早期医院护理:改良急诊分诊方案的影响
Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Nov;11(6):576-82. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90004-u.
4
Development and validation of a prioritization rule for obtaining an immediate 12-lead electrocardiogram in the emergency department to identify ST-elevation myocardial infarction.制定并验证一种在急诊科优先获取即时 12 导联心电图的规则,以识别 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。
Am Heart J. 2012 Mar;163(3):372-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.021.
5
Evaluation of chest pain in the ED: factors affecting triage decisions.急诊科胸痛评估:影响分诊决策的因素
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;21(1):68-70. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34202.
6
Factors that influence care priority for chest pain patients using the manchester triage system.影响使用曼彻斯特分诊系统的胸痛患者护理优先级的因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):e940-e950. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14011. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients.快速胸痛诊所的效果如何?8762例连续患者中初发心绞痛和非心源性胸痛的预后。
Heart. 2007 Apr;93(4):458-63. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.090894. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
8
Triage of patients for a rapid (5-minute) electrocardiogram: A rule based on presenting chief complaints.对患者进行快速(5分钟)心电图检查的分诊:一项基于主要就诊主诉的规则。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):554-60. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111057.
9
A method for improving arrival-to-electrocardiogram time in emergency department chest pain patients and the effect on door-to-balloon time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一种提高急诊科胸痛患者心电图到达时间的方法及其对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者门球时间的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
Identifying pleuritic chest pain.
Emerg Nurse. 2006 Jun;14(3):22-4. doi: 10.7748/en2006.06.14.3.22.c4230.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into orthopedic and trauma emergency care and current challenges in Germany.德国骨科与创伤急救护理洞察及当前挑战
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 22;51(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02829-3.
2
The design of an Obstetric Telephone Triage Guideline (OTTG): a mixed method study.产科电话分诊指南(OTTG)设计:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03076-1.
3
Evaluation of the Manchester triage system for patients with acute coronary syndrome.曼彻斯特分诊系统对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的评估。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Jun;132(11-12):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01632-x. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
The design and implementation of an obstetric triage system for unscheduled pregnancy related attendances: a mixed methods evaluation.未计划性妊娠就诊的产科分诊系统的设计与实施:混合方法评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1503-5.
5
[Absolute certainty cannot exist].
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Mar;111(2):136-7. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0134-8.
6
[Interdisciplinary emergency departments : first experiences from the ENT and head and neck perspective].[跨学科急诊科:从耳鼻喉科及头颈外科角度的初步经验]
HNO. 2012 Dec;60(12):1060-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2634-7.
7
Modern triage in the emergency department.现代急诊科分诊。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Dec;107(50):892-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
8
[Manchester triage system. Process optimization in the interdisciplinary emergency department].[曼彻斯特分诊系统。跨学科急诊科的流程优化]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Feb;58(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1477-9.
9
Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study.儿科急诊护理中的曼彻斯特分诊系统:前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 22;337:a1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1501.
10
Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care.曼彻斯特分诊系统在儿科急诊护理中的有效性。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Dec;23(12):906-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.038877.