Overton Donald A, Stanwood Gregg D, Patel Bhavesh N, Pragada Sreenivasa R, Gordon M Kathleen
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Apr;203(2):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1426-y. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
Accurate measurement of the threshold dosage of phenobarbital that can produce drug discrimination (DD) may improve our understanding of the mechanisms and properties of such discrimination.
This study aimed to compare three methods for determining the threshold dosage for phenobarbital (D) versus no-drug (N) DD.
Rats learned a D versus N DD in two-lever operant training chambers. A titration scheme was employed to increase or decrease dosage at the end of each 18-day block of sessions depending on whether the rat had achieved criterion accuracy during the sessions just completed. Three criterion rules were employed, all based on average percent drug lever responses during initial links of the last six D and six N sessions of a block. The criteria were: D% > 66 and N% < 33; D% > 50, and N% < 50; (D% - N%) > 33. Two squads of rats were trained, one immediately after the other.
All rats discriminated drug versus no drug. In most rats, dosage decreased to low levels and then oscillated near the minimum level required to maintain criterion performance. The lowest discriminated dosage significantly differed under the three criterion rules. The squad that was trained second may have benefited by partially duplicating the lever choices of the previous squad.
The lowest discriminated dosage is influenced by the criterion of discriminative control that is employed and is higher than the absolute threshold at which discrimination entirely disappears. Threshold estimations closer to absolute threshold can be obtained when criteria are employed that are more permissive of errors and that allow rats to maintain lever preferences.
准确测量可产生药物辨别(DD)的苯巴比妥阈值剂量,可能会增进我们对这种辨别的机制和特性的理解。
本研究旨在比较三种确定苯巴比妥(D)与无药物(N)辨别阈值剂量的方法。
大鼠在双杠杆操作训练箱中学习D与N的辨别。采用滴定方案,根据大鼠在刚完成的训练阶段是否达到标准准确性,在每个为期18天的训练阶段结束时增加或减少剂量。采用了三条标准规则,均基于一个训练阶段中最后六个D和六个N训练阶段初始环节中药物杠杆反应的平均百分比。标准为:D%>66且N%<33;D%>50且N%<50;(D%-N%)>33。两组大鼠依次进行训练。
所有大鼠都能辨别药物与无药物。在大多数大鼠中,剂量降至低水平,然后在维持标准表现所需的最低水平附近波动。在三条标准规则下,最低辨别剂量有显著差异。第二组训练的大鼠可能因部分重复前一组的杠杆选择而受益。
最低辨别剂量受所采用的辨别控制标准影响,且高于辨别完全消失时的绝对阈值。当采用更允许误差且允许大鼠维持杠杆偏好的标准时,可获得更接近绝对阈值的阈值估计。