Buckleton John S, Curran James M, Gill Peter
The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
DNA evidence recovered from a scene or collected in relation to a case is generally declared as a mixture when more than two alleles are observed at several loci. However, in principle, all DNA profiles may be considered to be potentially mixtures, even those that show not more than two alleles at any locus. When using a likelihood ratio approach to the interpretation of mixed DNA profiles it is necessary to postulate the number of potential contributors. However, this number is never known with certainty. The possibility of a, say three-person mixture, presenting four or fewer peaks at each locus of the CODIS set was explored by Paoletti et al. [D.R. Paoletti, T.E. Doom, C.M. Krane, M.L. Raymer, D.E. Krane, Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures, J. Forensic Sci. 50 (2005) 1361-1366]. In this work we extend this analysis to consider the profiler plus and SGM plus multiplices. We begin the assessment of the risk associated with current practice in the calculation of LR's. We open the discussion of possible ways to surmount this ambiguity.
从犯罪现场提取或与案件相关收集的DNA证据,当在多个基因座观察到两个以上等位基因时,通常被认定为混合样本。然而,原则上,所有DNA图谱都可能被视为潜在的混合样本,即使那些在任何基因座显示不超过两个等位基因的图谱也是如此。当使用似然比方法解释混合DNA图谱时,有必要假设潜在贡献者的数量。然而,这个数量永远无法确切知晓。Paoletti等人[D.R. Paoletti, T.E. Doom, C.M. Krane, M.L. Raymer, D.E. Krane, 《概念混合产生的STR图谱的实证分析》,《法医学杂志》50 (2005) 1361 - 1366]探讨了在CODIS系统的每个基因座出现四个或更少峰的三人混合样本的可能性。在这项工作中,我们扩展了这一分析,以考虑Profiler Plus和SGM Plus复合扩增系统。我们开始评估在计算似然比时与当前实践相关的风险。我们开启了关于克服这种模糊性的可能方法的讨论。