Reid Thomas M, Baird Michael L, Reid John P, Lee Susannie C, Lee Richard F
DNA Diagnostics Center, Fairfield, OH 45014, USA.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Sep;2(4):340-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
Pairs of individuals tested at the 13 CODIS core STR loci to determine sibship were used as a source of familial data that was seeded into a larger data set of 12,000 plus DNA profiles simulating a CODIS-like offender database. To determine whether known sibs could be found in the larger database two methods were used: degree of allele sharing and a kinship matching approach. The allele sharing method detected 62 of 109 of the known sib pairs (57%) while kinship matching detected 90 of the sib pairs (83%). Although kinship matching was the more efficient method of the two, the number of false positives generated prior to finding a true match was inversely related to the likelihood of sibship suggesting that many true siblings would not be easily found in a large forensic database via familial searching techniques.
在13个联合DNA索引系统(CODIS)核心短串联重复序列(STR)位点进行检测以确定亲属关系的个体对,被用作家族数据的来源,这些数据被植入到一个由12000多个DNA图谱组成的更大数据集中,模拟一个类似CODIS的罪犯数据库。为了确定在更大的数据库中能否找到已知的兄弟姐妹,使用了两种方法:等位基因共享程度和亲属关系匹配方法。等位基因共享方法在109对已知的兄弟姐妹对中检测到62对(57%),而亲属关系匹配方法检测到90对(83%)。虽然亲属关系匹配是两种方法中更有效的方法,但在找到真正匹配之前产生的假阳性数量与亲属关系的可能性呈负相关,这表明在大型法医数据库中,通过家族搜索技术不容易找到许多真正的兄弟姐妹。