• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用常染色体单核苷酸多态性(autosomal SNPs)作为补充标记来解析显示模糊短串联重复序列(STR)结果的亲缘关系测试。

Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.

作者信息

Phillips C, Fondevila M, García-Magariños M, Rodriguez A, Salas A, Carracedo A, Lareu M V

机构信息

Forensic Genetics Unit, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002
PMID:19083821
Abstract

When using a standard battery of STRs for relationship testing a small proportion of analyses can give ambiguous results - where the claimed relationship cannot be confirmed by a high enough paternity index or excluded with fully incompatible genotypes. The majority of such cases arise from unknowingly testing a brother of the true father and observing only a small number of exclusions that can each be interpreted as one- or two-step mutations. Although adding extra STRs might resolve a proportion of cases, there are few properly validated extra STRs available, while the commonly added hypervariable SE33 locus is four times more mutable than average, increasing the risk of ambiguous results. We have found SNPs in large multiplexes are much more informative for both low initial probabilities or ambiguous exclusions and at the same time provide a more reliable genotyping approach for the highly degraded DNA encountered in many identification cases. Eight relationship cases are outlined where the addition of SNP data resolved analyses that had remained ambiguous even with extended STR typing. In addition we have made simulations to ascertain the frequency of failing to obtain exclusions or conclusive probabilities of paternity with different marker sets when a brother of the true father is tested. Results indicate that SNPs are statistically more efficient than STRs in resolving cases that distinguish first-degree relatives in deficient pedigrees.

摘要

在使用标准的短串联重复序列(STR)组合进行亲缘关系检测时,一小部分分析可能会得出模糊的结果——即声称的亲缘关系无法通过足够高的父权指数得到证实,或者无法被完全不相容的基因型排除。大多数此类情况是由于在不知情的情况下检测了真正父亲的兄弟,并且只观察到少量的排除情况,而这些排除情况中的每一种都可能被解释为一步或两步突变。虽然添加额外的STR可能会解决一部分案例,但可用的经过适当验证的额外STR很少,而通常添加的高变区SE33位点的突变率是平均水平的四倍,增加了结果模糊的风险。我们发现,在大型多重检测中,单核苷酸多态性(SNP)对于低初始概率或模糊排除情况都更具信息性,同时为许多鉴定案例中遇到的高度降解的DNA提供了一种更可靠的基因分型方法。本文概述了八个亲缘关系案例,其中添加SNP数据解决了即使进行了扩展STR分型仍模糊不清的分析。此外,我们进行了模拟,以确定在检测真正父亲的兄弟时,使用不同标记集未能获得排除结果或确定父权概率的频率。结果表明,在解决区分缺陷谱系中一级亲属的案例时,SNP在统计学上比STR更有效。

相似文献

1
Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.使用常染色体单核苷酸多态性(autosomal SNPs)作为补充标记来解析显示模糊短串联重复序列(STR)结果的亲缘关系测试。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
2
Reinvestigations of six unusual paternity cases by typing of autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms.应用常染色体单核苷酸多态性基因分型技术对六例外源性亲权关系鉴定案例的重新调查。
Transfusion. 2012 Feb;52(2):425-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03260.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
3
[Significance of additional RFLP single locus probes analysis after STR based determination of sibship].[基于STR确定亲缘关系后进行额外RFLP单基因座探针分析的意义]
Arch Kriminol. 2007 Jul-Aug;220(1-2):25-35.
4
Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel.Genplex单核苷酸多态性分型系统及49重法医标记物组合的评估。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Jun;1(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
5
[Chromosome STR genetic markers in paternity identification].[染色体STR基因标记在亲子鉴定中的应用]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2004 Aug;29(4):432-4.
6
Performance of the SNPforID 52 SNP-plex assay in paternity testing.用于身份鉴定的52个单核苷酸多态性复合检测法在亲子鉴定中的性能。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Sep;2(4):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 23.
7
Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations.DNA标记物排除父权:父系突变的影响。
J Forensic Sci. 1996 Jul;41(4):671-7.
8
Assessing paternities with inconclusive STR results: The suitability of bi-allelic markers.利用无法得出明确 STR 结果来鉴定亲子关系:双等位基因标记的适用性。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jan;7(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
A SNaPshot assay for genotyping 44 individual identification single nucleotide polymorphisms.用于基因分型 44 个个体识别单核苷酸多态性的 SNaPshot assay。
Electrophoresis. 2011 Feb;32(3-4):368-78. doi: 10.1002/elps.201000426. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
10
[Kinship determination using DNA markers].[使用DNA标记进行亲缘关系鉴定]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 Feb;136(2):193-200. Epub 2008 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
NASTRA: accurate analysis of short tandem repeat markers by nanopore sequencing with repeat-structure-aware algorithm.NASTRA:利用具有重复结构感知算法的纳米孔测序技术对短串联重复标记进行精确分析。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Sep 23;25(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae472.
2
Performance of a 74-Microhaplotype Assay in Kinship Analyses.74 微单倍型检测在血缘关系分析中的表现。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Feb 10;15(2):224. doi: 10.3390/genes15020224.
3
Identification of the efficacy of parentage testing based on bi-allelic autosomal single nucleotide polymorphism markers in Taiwanese population.
基于双等位基因常染色体单核苷酸多态性标记的亲权鉴定在台湾人群中的功效鉴定。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Sep;20(3):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00790-y. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Comparison of three massively parallel sequencing platforms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping in forensic genetics.三种高通量测序平台用于法医遗传学中单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型的比较。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Sep;137(5):1361-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03035-9. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Developmental validation of the novel six-dye Goldeneye DNA ID System 35InDel kit for forensic application.用于法医应用的新型六色金眼DNA身份识别系统35InDel试剂盒的开发验证
Forensic Sci Res. 2021 Aug 28;7(4):673-684. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1945723. eCollection 2022.
6
State-of-the-Art Fluorescent Probes: Duplex-Specific Nuclease-Based Strategies for Early Disease Diagnostics.荧光探针的最新进展:基于双特异性核酸酶的早期疾病诊断策略。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;12(12):1172. doi: 10.3390/bios12121172.
7
Application of Y-STR, DIP-STR and SNP-STR Markers in of Forensic Genetic Profiling: A Narrative Review.Y染色体短串联重复序列、双等位基因短串联重复序列和单核苷酸多态性短串联重复序列标记在法医遗传学分析中的应用:综述
Iran J Public Health. 2022 Jul;51(7):1538-1545. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i7.10087.
8
Evaluation of a Custom SNP Panel for Identifying and Rectifying of Misjudged Paternity in Deficiency Cases.用于识别和纠正缺陷案例中误判亲子关系的定制单核苷酸多态性(SNP)检测板的评估
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 22;12:602429. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.602429. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of ten SNP Markers for Human Identification and Paternity Analysis in Persian Population.波斯人群中用于个体识别和亲子鉴定的十个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记的评估
Iran J Biotechnol. 2019 Sep 1;17(3):e2148. doi: 10.29252/ijb.2148. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
The MASTiFF panel-a versatile multiple-allele SNP test for forensics.MASTiFF 面板——一种用于法医的多功能多位点 SNP 测试。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Mar;134(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02233-8. Epub 2019 Dec 21.