• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于识别和纠正缺陷案例中误判亲子关系的定制单核苷酸多态性(SNP)检测板的评估

Evaluation of a Custom SNP Panel for Identifying and Rectifying of Misjudged Paternity in Deficiency Cases.

作者信息

Chang Liao, Yu Huiyun, Miao Xinyao, Wen Siqi, Zhang Bao, Li Shengbin

机构信息

Bio-evidence Sciences Academy, Western China Science and Technology Innovation Harbour, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2021 Feb 22;12:602429. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.602429. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.602429
PMID:33692823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937934/
Abstract

Parentage testing is routinely performed by genotyping short tandem repeat (STR) through capillary electrophoresis in the present. However, ambiguous or even misjudged paternity based on STRs happens from time to time in cases where only one putative parent is available. We analyzed STR data of 7,818,969 unrelated pairs and 75 close-relative pairs and found that although the probability of a random false match between non-relatives was 4.22 × 10, the incidence of false or ambiguous paternity results between children and first-degree relatives of their true parent was as high as 18.67%. These results highlight the risk of false inclusion of a relative or even non-relatives in parentage testing with STRs. We then validated all ambiguous STR results by targeted sequencing with a custom panel containing 4,830 individual identification single nucleotide polymorphisms (IISNP), found that the ratio of mismatch loci to total SNPs was 1.78-6.95% in close relatives compared with 10.93-13.49% in unrelated pairs. Last, we reported three real cases with undetermined paternity by STRs and rectified them by dissecting with our IISNP panel. These results suggested that high-density IISNP panel can be used to identify and rectify misjudged cases effectively.

摘要

目前,亲子鉴定通常通过毛细管电泳对短串联重复序列(STR)进行基因分型来完成。然而,在只有一位推定父母可供检测的情况下,基于STR的亲子鉴定结果出现模糊甚至错误判断的情况时有发生。我们分析了7818969对无血缘关系的个体以及75对近亲个体的STR数据,发现虽然非亲属之间随机错误匹配的概率为4.22×10,但孩子与其亲生父母的一级亲属之间出现错误或模糊亲子鉴定结果的发生率高达18.67%。这些结果凸显了在使用STR进行亲子鉴定时,将亲属甚至非亲属错误纳入的风险。然后,我们使用包含4830个个体识别单核苷酸多态性(IISNP)的定制面板进行靶向测序,对所有模糊的STR结果进行了验证,发现近亲中错配位点与总SNP的比例为1.78 - 6.95%,而非亲属对中这一比例为10.93 - 13.49%。最后,我们报告了三例通过STR无法确定亲子关系的真实案例,并通过我们的IISNP面板进行分析纠正了这些案例。这些结果表明,高密度IISNP面板可有效用于识别和纠正误判案例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9b/7937934/21feefa203d4/fgene-12-602429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9b/7937934/c9fa365ebf44/fgene-12-602429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9b/7937934/21feefa203d4/fgene-12-602429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9b/7937934/c9fa365ebf44/fgene-12-602429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b9b/7937934/21feefa203d4/fgene-12-602429-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Custom SNP Panel for Identifying and Rectifying of Misjudged Paternity in Deficiency Cases.用于识别和纠正缺陷案例中误判亲子关系的定制单核苷酸多态性(SNP)检测板的评估
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 22;12:602429. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.602429. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and application of a nonbinary SNP-based microhaplotype panel for paternity testing involving close relatives.开发和应用基于非二态 SNP 的微单倍型面板进行涉及近亲的亲子鉴定。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 May;46:102255. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102255. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Efficiency evaluation of common forensic genetic markers for parentage identification involving close relatives.涉及近亲的亲子鉴定中常用法医遗传标记的效能评估
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Apr;345:111594. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111594. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing.利用大规模并行测序技术提高成对亲缘关系分析。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jan;38:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.探索基于单核苷酸多态性的亲权和亲缘关系鉴定的功效。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Assessing paternities with inconclusive STR results: The suitability of bi-allelic markers.利用无法得出明确 STR 结果来鉴定亲子关系:双等位基因标记的适用性。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jan;7(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
7
[A study on paternity testing with 96 autosomal SNPs].[一项关于96个常染色体单核苷酸多态性亲子鉴定的研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;29(1):28-33. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2012.01.008.
8
SNP Markers as Additional Information to Resolve Complex Kinship Cases.单核苷酸多态性标记作为解决复杂亲属关系案例的附加信息。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2015 Nov;42(6):385-8. doi: 10.1159/000440832. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.使用常染色体单核苷酸多态性(autosomal SNPs)作为补充标记来解析显示模糊短串联重复序列(STR)结果的亲缘关系测试。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
Identification of the efficacy of parentage testing based on bi-allelic autosomal single nucleotide polymorphism markers in Taiwanese population.基于双等位基因常染色体单核苷酸多态性标记的亲权鉴定在台湾人群中的功效鉴定。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Sep;20(3):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00790-y. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of the Remains of an Adult Using DNA from Their Deciduous Teeth as a Reference Sample.利用脱落乳牙 DNA 作为参考样本鉴定成年人遗骸。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 23;59(10):1702. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101702.
2
Improving kinship probability in analysis of ancient skeletons using identity SNPs and MPS technology.利用身份 SNP 和 MPS 技术提高古骨骼分析中的亲属关系概率。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Jul;137(4):1007-1015. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03003-3. Epub 2023 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing 23 Y-STR loci mutation rates in Chinese Han father-son pairs from southwestern China.评估中国西南地区汉族父子 23 个 Y-STR 基因座的突变率。
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Oct;47(10):7755-7760. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05851-3. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Development and comprehensive evaluation of a noninvasive prenatal paternity testing method through a scaled trial.通过规模试验开发和综合评估一种非侵入性产前亲子鉴定方法。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov;43:102158. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102158. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Evaluation of parentage testing accuracy of child trafficking cases: Combining the exclusion probability and likelihood ratio approaches.
评估拐卖儿童案件亲子关系鉴定准确性:结合排除概率和似然比方法。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
4
A case of chimerism-induced paternity confusion: what ART practitioners can do to prevent future calamity for families.嵌合体导致的亲权混淆案例:ART 从业者如何预防家庭未来的灾难。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1064-6. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Effects of using the GlobalFiler™ multiplex system on parent-child analyses of cases with single locus inconsistency.使用GlobalFiler™多重系统对单一位点不一致案件进行亲子关系分析的效果。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016 Jan;18:72-4. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
6
A global reference for human genetic variation.人类遗传变异的全球参考。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.
7
Molecular insights of saliva in solving paternity dispute.唾液在解决亲子关系纠纷中的分子见解。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015 Jan-Apr;7(1):76-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.150325.
8
Usefulness of SNPs as Supplementary Markers in a Paternity Case with 3 Genetic Incompatibilities at Autosomal and Y Chromosomal Loci.常染色体和 Y 染色体 3 个遗传不相容位点的亲子鉴定案例中 SNP 作为补充标记的有用性。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2014 Apr;41(2):117-21. doi: 10.1159/000357989. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
Pretense of parentage by siblings in immigration: Polesky's paradox reconsidered.兄弟姐妹在移民中冒充父母:重新考虑波莱斯基悖论。
Transfusion. 2014 Feb;54(2):456-60. doi: 10.1111/trf.12293. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
The risk of false inclusion of a relative in parentage testing - an in silico population study.亲子鉴定中错误纳入亲属的风险——一项计算机模拟人群研究。
Croat Med J. 2013 Jun;54(3):257-62. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.257.