Kilgore Meredith, Brossette Stephen
Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):S172.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.004.
Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (BSIs) are relatively rare but do not occur randomly. This suggests that unobserved confounding factors can bias estimates of BSI-associated incremental costs of care. Compared with previous studies, this analysis used a large sample size for greater precision, actual cost-accounting data, and case matching combined with bounding estimates to correct for bias.
Data from 1,355,647 admissions during 69 months in 55 hospitals were collected from a large population database. BSIs were identified by the Nosocomial Infection Marker, a well-validated, electronic, laboratory-based marker used for automatic infection surveillance. Costs were obtained by matching laboratory data with hospital accounting system calculations and converted to 2006 US dollars.
Of 58,376 presumed nosocomial infections, 12,578 (21.6%) were identified as BSIs. More than 50% of BSIs occurred within the first week of hospitalization and 80% during the first 2 weeks. Various analyses resulted in the following estimates of BSI-associated incremental costs: basic regression analysis, $19,643 (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: $9026-$30,260); excluding infections occurring after day 14, $19,427 (P < .001; 95% CI: $8867-$29,986); excluding infections occurring after day 7, $20,600 (P < .001; 95% CI: $10,123-$30,077); controlling for other nosocomial infections, $12,774 (P < .001; 95% CI: $6257-$19,290); and controlling for length of stay, $5534 (P < .012; 95% CI: $1282-$9785).
Even when intentionally underestimated, BSI-associated increased costs are substantial. True costs of BSIs are likely to be between $10,000 and $20,000. More research is needed to explore how controlling BSI costs may affect the cost of inpatient care.
医院获得性血流感染(BSIs)相对少见,但并非随机发生。这表明存在未观察到的混杂因素可能会使对与BSI相关的护理增量成本的估计产生偏差。与以往研究相比,本分析使用了更大的样本量以提高精度,采用了实际成本核算数据,并结合病例匹配和边界估计来校正偏差。
从一个大型人群数据库中收集了55家医院69个月内1,355,647例住院病例的数据。通过医院感染标志物来识别BSIs,该标志物是一种经过充分验证的、基于实验室的电子标志物,用于自动感染监测。通过将实验室数据与医院会计系统计算结果相匹配来获取成本,并换算为2006年美元。
在58,376例疑似医院感染病例中,12,578例(21.6%)被确定为BSIs。超过50%的BSIs发生在住院的第一周内,80%发生在头两周内。各种分析得出了以下与BSI相关的增量成本估计值:基本回归分析为19,643美元(P <.0001;95%置信区间[CI]:9026美元至30,260美元);排除第14天后发生的感染,为19,427美元(P <.001;95%CI:8867美元至29,986美元);排除第7天后发生的感染,为20,600美元(P <.001;95%CI:10,123美元至30,077美元);控制其他医院感染后,为12,774美元(P <.001;95%CI:6257美元至19,290美元);控制住院时间后,为5534美元(P <.012;95%CI:1282美元至9785美元)。
即使故意低估,与BSI相关的成本增加也是巨大的。BSIs的实际成本可能在10,000美元至20,000美元之间。需要更多研究来探讨控制BSI成本可能如何影响住院护理成本。