Hermann Joseph R, Zimmerman Jeffrey J
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1250, USA.
Can J Vet Res. 2008 Oct;72(5):440-3.
Research and surveillance activities involving airborne pathogens rely on the capture and enumeration of pathogens suspended in aerosols. The objective of this study was to estimate the analytical sensitivity (detection threshold) of each of 4 air samplers for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV). In a 5-min sampling period under controlled conditions, the analytical sensitivity of the AGI-30 (Ace Glass, Vineland, New Jersey, USA), AGI-4 (Ace Glass), SKC BioSampler (SKC, Eighty Four, Pennsylvania, USA), and Midwest Micro-Tek sampler (Midwest Micro-Tek, Brookings, South Dakota, USA) was calculated at 1 x 10(1.1), 1 x 10(1.3), 1 X 10(1.1), and 1 x 10(1.2) median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) equivalents for PRRSV and 1 x 10(1.4), 1 x 10(1.1), 1 x 10(1.6), and 1 x 10(1.2) TCID50 equivalents for SIV [per 60 L (5-min sampling period)]. Despite marked differences in sampler design, no statistically significant difference in analytical sensitivity was detected between the samplers for collection of artificially produced aerosols containing cell-culture-propagated PRRSV or SIV.
涉及空气传播病原体的研究和监测活动依赖于对悬浮在气溶胶中的病原体进行捕获和计数。本研究的目的是评估4种空气采样器对猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)和猪流感病毒(SIV)的分析灵敏度(检测阈值)。在受控条件下的5分钟采样期内,计算了AGI - 30(美国新泽西州文兰市Ace Glass公司)、AGI - 4(Ace Glass公司)、SKC生物采样器(美国宾夕法尼亚州八十四市SKC公司)和中西部微技术采样器(美国南达科他州布鲁金斯市中西部微技术公司)对PRRSV的分析灵敏度,分别为每60升(5分钟采样期)1×10(1.1)、1×10(1.3)、1×10(1.1)和1×10(1.2)半数组织培养感染剂量(TCID50)当量,对SIV的分析灵敏度分别为1×10(1.4)、1×10(1.1)、1×10(1.6)和1×10(1.2) TCID50当量。尽管采样器设计存在显著差异,但在收集含有细胞培养增殖的PRRSV或SIV的人工产生气溶胶时,各采样器之间未检测到分析灵敏度的统计学显著差异。