Kai Akiko, Hashimoto Manabu, Okazaki Tetsuya, Hachisuka Kenji
Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
J UOEH. 2008 Dec 1;30(4):403-11. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.30.403.
We conducted neuropsychological tests of patients with higher brain dysfunction to examine the characteristics of barriers to employment.
We tested 92 patients with higher brain dysfunction (average age of 36.3 +/- 13.8 years old, ranging between 16 and 63 years old, with an average post-injury period of 35.6 +/- 67.8 months) who were hospitalized at the university hospital between February 2002 and June 2007 for further neuropsychological evaluation, conducting the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R), the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). The outcomes after discharge were classified between competitive employment, sheltered employment and non-employment, and the three groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance and the Scheffe test. The WAIS-R subtests were mutually compared based on the standard values of significant differences described in the WAIS-R manual. Verbal performance and full scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of WAIS-R were 87.7 +/- 15.6 (mean +/- standard deviation), 78.5 +/- 18.1 and 81.0 +/- 17.2, respectively, and verbal memory, visual memory, general memory, attention/concentration and delayed recall were 74.6 +/- 20.0, 76.6 +/- 21.4, 72.0 +/- 20.4, 89.0 +/- 16.5 and 65.2 +/- 20.8, respectively. The competitive employment group showed significantly higher scores in performance IQ and full IQ on the WAIS-R and verbal memory, visual memory, general memory and delayed recall on the WMS-R and RBMT than the non-employment group. The sheltered employment group showed a significantly higher score in delayed recall than the non-employment group. No difference was observed in the FAB or BADS between the three groups. In the subtests of the WAIS-R, the score for Digit Symbol-Coding was significantly lower than almost all the other subtests. For patients with higher brain dysfunction, IQ (full scale IQ > 53.2) and memory (general memory > 74.1) are important indicators in returning to work under the conditions of competitive employment.
我们对患有高级脑功能障碍的患者进行了神经心理学测试,以研究就业障碍的特征。
我们测试了92例患有高级脑功能障碍的患者(平均年龄36.3±13.8岁,年龄范围在16至63岁之间,平均受伤后时间为35.6±67.8个月),这些患者于2002年2月至2007年6月期间在大学医院住院,以进行进一步的神经心理学评估,实施了韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)、韦氏记忆量表修订版(WMS-R)、里弗米德行为记忆测试(RBMT)、额叶评估量表(FAB)和执行功能障碍综合征行为评估(BADS)。出院后的结果分为竞争性就业、庇护性就业和未就业,使用单因素方差分析和谢费检验对三组进行比较。根据WAIS-R手册中描述的显著差异标准值,对WAIS-R的各个子测试进行相互比较。WAIS-R的言语表现和全量表智商(IQ)分别为87.7±15.6(平均值±标准差)、78.5±18.1和81.0±17.2,言语记忆、视觉记忆、一般记忆、注意力/集中力和延迟回忆分别为74.6±20.0、76.6±21.4、72.0±20.4、89.0±16.5和65.2±20.8。竞争性就业组在WAIS-R的操作智商和全量表智商以及WMS-R和RBMT的言语记忆、视觉记忆、一般记忆和延迟回忆方面的得分显著高于未就业组。庇护性就业组在延迟回忆方面的得分显著高于未就业组。三组在FAB或BADS方面未观察到差异。在WAIS-R的子测试中,数字符号编码的得分显著低于几乎所有其他子测试。对于患有高级脑功能障碍的患者,智商(全量表智商>53.2)和记忆(一般记忆>74.1)是在竞争性就业条件下重返工作的重要指标。