Hannay Kevin, Marcotte Edward M, Vogel Christine
Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2500 Speedway, MBB 3.210, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2008 Dec 16;9:609. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-609.
One mechanism to account for robustness against gene knockouts or knockdowns is through buffering by gene duplicates, but the extent and general correlates of this process in organisms is still a matter of debate. To reveal general trends of this process, we provide a comprehensive comparison of gene essentiality, duplication and buffering by duplicates across seven bacteria (Mycoplasma genitalium, Bacillus subtilis, Helicobacter pylori, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli), and four eukaryotes (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), Caenorhabditis elegans (worm), Drosophila melanogaster (fly), Mus musculus (mouse)).
In nine of the eleven organisms, duplicates significantly increase chances of survival upon gene deletion (P-value < or = 0.05), but only by up to 13%. Given that duplicates make up to 80% of eukaryotic genomes, the small contribution is surprising and points to dominant roles of other buffering processes, such as alternative metabolic pathways. The buffering capacity of duplicates appears to be independent of the degree of gene essentiality and tends to be higher for genes with high expression levels. For example, buffering capacity increases to 23% amongst highly expressed genes in E. coli. Sequence similarity and the number of duplicates per gene are weak predictors of the duplicate's buffering capacity. In a case study we show that buffering gene duplicates in yeast and worm are somewhat more similar in their functions than non-buffering duplicates and have increased transcriptional and translational activity.
In sum, the extent of gene essentiality and buffering by duplicates is not conserved across organisms and does not correlate with the organisms' apparent complexity. This heterogeneity goes beyond what would be expected from differences in experimental approaches alone. Buffering by duplicates contributes to robustness in several organisms, but to a small extent--and the relatively large amount of buffering by duplicates observed in yeast and worm may be largely specific to these organisms. Thus, the only common factor of buffering by duplicates between different organisms may be the by-product of duplicate retention due to demands of high dosage.
一种解释对基因敲除或敲低具有稳健性的机制是通过基因复制体的缓冲作用,但该过程在生物体中的程度和一般相关性仍存在争议。为了揭示这一过程的总体趋势,我们对七种细菌(生殖支原体、枯草芽孢杆菌、幽门螺杆菌、流感嗜血杆菌、结核分枝杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌)和四种真核生物(酿酒酵母(酵母)、秀丽隐杆线虫(线虫)、黑腹果蝇(果蝇)、小家鼠(小鼠))的基因必需性、复制和复制体缓冲作用进行了全面比较。
在11种生物体中的9种中,复制体显著增加了基因缺失后的存活机会(P值≤0.05),但增幅仅高达13%。鉴于复制体在真核生物基因组中所占比例高达80%,如此小的贡献令人惊讶,并表明其他缓冲过程(如替代代谢途径)发挥着主导作用。复制体的缓冲能力似乎与基因必需性程度无关,并且对于高表达水平的基因往往更高。例如,在大肠杆菌中,高表达基因的缓冲能力增加到23%。序列相似性和每个基因的复制体数量对复制体的缓冲能力的预测作用较弱。在一个案例研究中,我们表明酵母和线虫中的缓冲基因复制体在功能上比非缓冲复制体更相似,并且具有增强的转录和翻译活性。
总之,基因必需性和复制体缓冲作用的程度在不同生物体中并不保守,并且与生物体的表观复杂性无关。这种异质性超出了仅由实验方法差异所预期的范围。复制体缓冲作用有助于几种生物体的稳健性,但程度较小——在酵母和线虫中观察到的相对大量的复制体缓冲作用可能在很大程度上是这些生物体所特有的。因此,不同生物体之间复制体缓冲作用的唯一共同因素可能是由于高剂量需求而保留复制体的副产品。