• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物选择与摄入:迈向学习与进食动机的统一框架

Food choice and intake: towards a unifying framework of learning and feeding motivation.

作者信息

Day J E, Kyriazakis I, Rogers P J

机构信息

Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6BZ, UK.

出版信息

Nutr Res Rev. 1998 Jun;11(1):25-43. doi: 10.1079/NRR19980004.

DOI:10.1079/NRR19980004
PMID:19087458
Abstract

The food choice and intake of animals (including humans) has typically been studied using frameworks of learning and feeding motivation. When used in isolation such frameworks could be criticized because learning paradigms give little consideration to how new food items are included or excluded from an individual's diet, and motivational paradigms do not explain how individuals decide which food to eat when given a choice. Consequently we are posed with the question of whether individuals actively interact with the food items present in their environment to learn about their nutritional properties? The thesis of this review is that individuals are motivated to actively sample food items in order to assess whether they are nutritionally beneficial or harmful. We offer a unifying framework, centred upon the concept of exploratory motivation, which is a synthesis of learning and paradigms of feeding motivation. In this framework information gathering occurs on two levels through exploratory behaviour: (i) the discrimination of food from nonfood items, and (ii) the continued monitoring and storage of information concerning the nutritional properties of these food items. We expect that this framework will advance our understanding of the behavioural control of nutrient intake by explaining how new food items are identified in the environment, and how individuals are able to monitor changes in the nutritional content of their food resource.

摘要

动物(包括人类)的食物选择和摄入量通常是使用学习和进食动机框架来研究的。单独使用这些框架时可能会受到批评,因为学习范式很少考虑新食物如何被纳入或排除在个体饮食中,而动机范式无法解释个体在有选择时如何决定吃哪种食物。因此,我们面临这样一个问题:个体是否会积极与环境中存在的食物相互作用,以了解它们的营养特性?本综述的论点是,个体有动机积极对食物进行采样,以评估它们在营养上是有益还是有害。我们提供了一个统一的框架,以探索性动机的概念为中心,它是学习和进食动机范式的综合。在这个框架中,信息收集通过探索行为在两个层面上发生:(i)区分食物和非食物项目,以及(ii)持续监测和存储有关这些食物项目营养特性的信息。我们期望这个框架将通过解释如何在环境中识别新食物项目,以及个体如何能够监测其食物资源营养成分的变化,来推进我们对营养摄入行为控制的理解。

相似文献

1
Food choice and intake: towards a unifying framework of learning and feeding motivation.食物选择与摄入:迈向学习与进食动机的统一框架
Nutr Res Rev. 1998 Jun;11(1):25-43. doi: 10.1079/NRR19980004.
2
[Assessing various aspects of the motivation to eat that can affect food intake and body weight control].评估可能影响食物摄入量和体重控制的进食动机的各个方面
Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
3
Age-dependent patterns of intensive observation on elders by free-ranging juvenile Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui) within foraging context on Yakushima.屋久岛自由放养的日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata yakui)幼崽在觅食环境中对年长个体进行密集观察的年龄依赖性模式。
Am J Primatol. 2008 Dec;70(12):1103-13. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20603.
4
A theory of associating food types with their postingestive consequences.一种将食物类型与其摄入后结果相关联的理论。
Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):705-16. doi: 10.1086/502805. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
5
Influence of age on mastication: effects on eating behaviour.年龄对咀嚼的影响:对进食行为的作用
Nutr Res Rev. 2004 Jun;17(1):43-54. doi: 10.1079/NRR200375.
6
[Learning potential and cognitive remediation in schizophrenia].[精神分裂症的学习潜能与认知矫正]
Encephale. 2009 Sep;35(4):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.06.014. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
7
Relationship between reluctance to eat novel foods and open-field behavior in sheep.绵羊对新奇食物的拒食与旷场行为之间的关系。
Physiol Behav. 2009 Feb 16;96(2):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
8
How do giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) respond to varying properties of enrichments? A comparison of behavioral profiles among five enrichment items.大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)如何应对不同特性的环境富集物?对五种环境富集物的行为特征进行比较。
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):325-34. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.325.
9
A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort.关于反刍动物如何控制食物摄入量和选择的个人观点:最小化总体不适感。
Nutr Res Rev. 2007 Dec;20(2):132-46. doi: 10.1017/S0954422407797834.
10
The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.学习动态以及向近端学习区域分配学习时间的情况。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):530-42. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530.

引用本文的文献

1
Size matters: lower body weight pigs have a different response to immune challenge and amino acids supplementation above the estimated requirement compared to heavy pigs.体型很重要:与体重较大的猪相比,体重较轻的猪在受到免疫挑战和补充估计需求以上的氨基酸时,会有不同的反应。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae255.
2
Welfare of pigs on farm.农场中猪的福利。
EFSA J. 2022 Aug 25;20(8):e07421. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Providing Effective Environmental Enrichment to Pigs: How Far Have We Come?为猪提供有效的环境富集:我们取得了多大进展?
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 21;9(5):254. doi: 10.3390/ani9050254.
4
Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves.圈养和饲养条件相同的狗和狼的食物偏好。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203165. eCollection 2018.
5
The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs.关系对狼和狗的新事物恐惧症及探索行为的影响。
Anim Behav. 2015 Sep;107:159-173. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008.
6
Consistent proportional macronutrient intake selected by adult domestic cats (Felis catus) despite variations in macronutrient and moisture content of foods offered.尽管提供的食物中的宏量营养素和水分含量有所变化,但成年家猫(Felis catus)仍能选择一致的宏量营养素比例摄入。
J Comp Physiol B. 2013 May;183(4):525-36. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0727-y. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.下调蜜蜂 IRS 基因会使行为偏向富含蛋白质的食物。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Apr 1;6(4):e1000896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000896.
8
Resource distributions affect social learning on multiple timescales.资源分配在多个时间尺度上影响社会学习。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009 Sep;63(11):1643-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0771-0. Epub 2009 May 30.
9
Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.在双选偏好测试中,食草动物会避开蛋白质水解产物,但杂食动物不会。
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004126. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
10
Does Bertrand's rule apply to macronutrients?伯特兰法则适用于常量营养素吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2429-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3271.