Raffard S, Gely-Nargeot M-C, Capdevielle D, Bayard S, Boulenger J-P
Service universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, hôpital de la Colombière, CHU de Montpellier, 39, avenue Charles-Flahault, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Encephale. 2009 Sep;35(4):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.06.014. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
Many studies have stressed the importance of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia that represent a core feature of the pathology. Cognitive dysfunctions are present in 80% of schizophrenic patients, including deficits in attention, memory, speed processing and executive functioning, with well-known functional consequences on daily life, social functioning and rehabilitation outcome. Recent studies have stressed that cognitive deficits, rather than the positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia, predict poor performance in basic activities of daily living. If it is possible to reduce psychotic symptoms and to prevent relapses with antipsychotic medication, it is not yet possible to have the same convincing impact on cognitive or functional impairments. Cognitive remediation is a new psychological treatment which has proved its efficacy in reducing cognitive deficits. A growing literature on cognitive rehabilitation suggests possibilities that in schizophrenia, specific techniques are able to enhance an individual's cognitive functioning.
Presently, two distinct and complementary cognitive remediation methods have been developed: the compensatory and the restorative approaches: (A) restorative approaches attempt to improve function by recruiting relatively intact cognitive processes to fill the role of those impaired, or by using prosthetic aids to compensate for the loss of function; (B) in contrast, in the restorative approach cognitive deficits are targeted directly through repeated practice training. However, results concerning cognitive remediation remain inconsistent. It is clear that not all individuals with schizophrenia display cognitive impairment, and even among those who do, the specific pattern of cognitive functioning varies. Moreover, traditional neurocognitive assessment, with a single or static administration of cognitive measures, provides moderately good prediction of skills acquisition in schizophrenia. Among other factors such as motivation, awareness of having a disease and acuteness of symptomatology, some studies have exposed that a cognitive variable, learning potential could mediate in part the effectiveness of cognitive remediation.
The concept of learning potential is used to explain some of the observed variability in cognitive functioning. Learning potential is the ability to attain and utilize cognitive skills after cognitive training: it is assessed by individual variation in performance across three consecutive administrations of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): a pretest with standard instruction procedures, a training phase with expanded instruction and a post test with only standard instruction. Three learner subtypes can be identified: "learners" who perform poorly at the pretest but improve performance during the post-test, "non-retainers" who perform poorly at pre-test and do not improve at post-testing and "high achievers" who perform well in the initial pretest and maintain their good performance across the other two administrations. The assessment of learning potential could predict, with other psychological measures such as insight and motivation, the most effective neurocognitive rehabilitation program for an individual patient, and could help the clinician to optimize patient outcome through appropriate individual management.
Indeed, learning potential could represent a good cognitive predictor and indicator for rehabilitation in schizophrenia for clinicians and should be used in cognitive assessment practice. However, the individuals most likely to benefit from cognitive remediation, and whether changes in cognitive function translate into functional improvements, are as yet unclear.
许多研究强调了精神分裂症中神经认知缺陷的重要性,这些缺陷是该病理的核心特征。80%的精神分裂症患者存在认知功能障碍,包括注意力、记忆力、处理速度和执行功能方面的缺陷,对日常生活、社交功能和康复结果具有众所周知的功能性影响。最近的研究强调,认知缺陷而非精神分裂症的阳性或阴性症状,预示着日常生活基本活动中的不良表现。虽然使用抗精神病药物有可能减轻精神病症状并预防复发,但尚未能对认知或功能障碍产生同样令人信服的影响。认知矫正疗法是一种新的心理治疗方法,已证明其在减少认知缺陷方面的有效性。关于认知康复的文献越来越多,表明在精神分裂症中,特定技术能够增强个体的认知功能。
目前,已经开发出两种不同但互补的认知矫正方法:代偿性方法和恢复性方法:(A) 恢复性方法试图通过利用相对完整的认知过程来填补受损认知过程的角色,或使用辅助工具来弥补功能丧失,从而改善功能;(B) 相比之下,在恢复性方法中,认知缺陷通过反复练习训练直接针对。然而,关于认知矫正的结果仍然不一致。显然,并非所有精神分裂症患者都表现出认知障碍,即使在那些有认知障碍的患者中,认知功能的具体模式也各不相同。此外,传统的神经认知评估,即单次或静态地应用认知测量方法,对精神分裂症患者技能习得的预测效果一般。在动机、疾病意识和症状严重程度等其他因素中,一些研究表明,一个认知变量,即学习潜力,可能部分介导认知矫正的有效性。
学习潜力的概念用于解释观察到的认知功能的一些变异性。学习潜力是指在认知训练后获得和利用认知技能的能力:它通过威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)连续三次施测中个体表现的变化来评估:一次采用标准指导程序的预测试、一次采用扩展指导的训练阶段和一次仅采用标准指导的后测试。可以识别出三种学习者亚型:“学习者”,他们在预测试中表现不佳,但在后测试中表现有所改善;“非保持者”,他们在预测试中表现不佳,在后测试中没有改善;“高成就者”,他们在初始预测试中表现良好,并在其他两次施测中保持良好表现。学习潜力的评估可以与洞察力和动机等其他心理测量方法一起,预测针对个体患者最有效的神经认知康复计划,并可以帮助临床医生通过适当的个体化管理优化患者的治疗结果。
事实上,学习潜力可能是临床医生用于精神分裂症康复的良好认知预测指标,应在认知评估实践中使用。然而,最有可能从认知矫正中受益的个体,以及认知功能的变化是否转化为功能改善,目前尚不清楚。