Field Kristin L, Bachmanov Alexander A, Mennella Julie A, Beauchamp Gary K, Kimball Bruce A
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004126. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
The negative sensory properties of casein hydrolysates (HC) often limit their usage in products intended for human consumption, despite HC being nutritious and having many functional benefits. Recent, but taxonomically limited, evidence suggests that other animals also avoid consuming HC when alternatives exist.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We evaluated ingestive responses of five herbivorous species (guinea pig, mountain beaver, gopher, vole, and rabbit) and five omnivorous species (rat, coyote, house mouse, white-footed mouse, and deer mouse; N = 16-18/species) using solid foods containing 20% HC in a series of two-choice preference tests that used a non-protein, cellulose-based alternative. Individuals were also tested with collagen hydrolysate (gelatin; GE) to determine whether it would induce similar ingestive responses to those induced by HC. Despite HC and GE having very different nutritional and sensory qualities, both hydrolysates produced similar preference score patterns. We found that the herbivores generally avoided the hydrolysates while the omnivores consumed them at similar levels to the cellulose diet or, more rarely, preferred them (HC by the white-footed mouse; GE by the rat). Follow-up preference tests pairing HC and the nutritionally equivalent intact casein (C) were performed on the three mouse species and the guinea pigs. For the mice, mean HC preference scores were lower in the HC v C compared to the HC v Cel tests, indicating that HC's sensory qualities negatively affected its consumption. However, responses were species-specific. For the guinea pigs, repeated exposure to HC or C (4.7-h sessions; N = 10) were found to increase subsequent HC preference scores in an HC v C preference test, which was interpreted in the light of conservative foraging strategies thought to typify herbivores.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first empirical study of dietary niche-related taxonomic differences in ingestive responses to protein hydrolysates using multiple species under comparable conditions. Our results provide a basis for future work in sensory, physiological, and behavioral mechanisms of hydrolysate avoidance and on the potential use of hydrolysates for pest management.
酪蛋白水解物(HC)的负面感官特性常常限制了它们在供人类食用的产品中的应用,尽管HC营养丰富且具有许多功能益处。最近但分类学范围有限的证据表明,当有其他选择时,其他动物也会避免食用HC。
方法/主要发现:我们通过一系列双选偏好测试,使用含有20%HC的固体食物以及一种非蛋白质、基于纤维素的替代品,评估了五种草食性物种(豚鼠、山地河狸、囊鼠、田鼠和兔子)和五种杂食性物种(大鼠、郊狼、家鼠、白足鼠和鹿鼠;每种物种16 - 18只)的摄食反应。还对个体进行了胶原蛋白水解物(明胶;GE)测试,以确定它是否会引发与HC相似的摄食反应。尽管HC和GE在营养和感官特性上有很大差异,但两种水解物产生了相似的偏好得分模式。我们发现草食性动物通常会避开这些水解物,而杂食性动物对它们的摄入量与纤维素饮食相似,或者更罕见的情况是更喜欢它们(白足鼠偏好HC;大鼠偏好GE)。对三种小鼠物种和豚鼠进行了后续的偏好测试,将HC与营养等效的完整酪蛋白(C)配对。对于小鼠,与HC对纤维素(Cel)测试相比,在HC对C测试中HC的平均偏好得分更低,表明HC的感官特性对其消费产生了负面影响。然而,反应具有物种特异性。对于豚鼠,发现在HC对C偏好测试中,重复接触HC或C(4.7小时时段;10只)会增加后续HC的偏好得分,这是根据被认为是草食性动物典型特征的保守觅食策略来解释的。
结论/意义:这是第一项在可比条件下使用多个物种对蛋白质水解物摄食反应中与饮食生态位相关的分类学差异进行的实证研究。我们的结果为未来关于水解物回避的感官、生理和行为机制以及水解物在害虫管理中的潜在用途的研究提供了基础。