Altenburg Teatske M, de Ruiter Cornelis J, Verdijk Peter W L, van Mechelen Willem, de Haan Arnold
Institute for Biomedical Research into Human Movement and Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cheshire, UK.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Dec;33(6):1086-95. doi: 10.1139/H08-092.
A single shortening contraction reduces the force capacity of muscle fibers, whereas force capacity is enhanced following lengthening. However, how motor unit recruitment and discharge rate (muscle activation) are adapted to such changes in force capacity during submaximal contractions remains unknown. Additionally, there is limited evidence for force enhancement in larger muscles. We therefore investigated lengthening- and shortening-induced changes in activation of the knee extensors. We hypothesized that when the same submaximal torque had to be generated following shortening, muscle activation had to be increased, whereas a lower activation would suffice to produce the same torque following lengthening. Muscle activation following shortening and lengthening (20 degrees at 10 degrees /s) was determined using rectified surface electromyography (rsEMG) in a 1st session (at 10% and 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and additionally with EMG of 42 vastus lateralis motor units recorded in a 2nd session (at 4%-47%MVC). rsEMG and motor unit discharge rates following shortening and lengthening were normalized to isometric reference contractions. As expected, normalized rsEMG (1.15 +/- 0.19) and discharge rate (1.11 +/- 0.09) were higher following shortening (p < 0.05). Following lengthening, normalized rsEMG (0.91 +/- 0.10) was, as expected, lower than 1.0 (p < 0.05), but normalized discharge rate (0.99 +/- 0.08) was not (p > 0.05). Thus, muscle activation was increased to compensate for a reduced force capacity following shortening by increasing the discharge rate of the active motor units (rate coding). In contrast, following lengthening, rsEMG decreased while the discharge rates of active motor units remained similar, suggesting that derecruitment of units might have occurred.
单次缩短收缩会降低肌纤维的力量产生能力,而延长收缩后力量产生能力会增强。然而,在次最大收缩过程中,运动单位募集和放电频率(肌肉激活)如何适应这种力量产生能力的变化仍不清楚。此外,关于较大肌肉力量增强的证据有限。因此,我们研究了延长收缩和缩短收缩引起的膝关节伸肌激活变化。我们假设,在缩短收缩后必须产生相同的次最大扭矩时,肌肉激活必须增加,而在延长收缩后产生相同扭矩则只需较低的激活水平。在第一次实验中(在最大自主收缩(MVC)的10%和50%时),使用整流表面肌电图(rsEMG)测定缩短收缩和延长收缩(以10度/秒的速度进行20度)后的肌肉激活情况,此外,在第二次实验中(在4%-47%MVC时)记录42个股外侧肌运动单位的肌电图。将缩短收缩和延长收缩后的rsEMG和运动单位放电频率归一化为等长参考收缩。正如预期的那样,缩短收缩后归一化的rsEMG(1.15±0.19)和放电频率(1.11±0.09)更高(p<0.05)。延长收缩后,如预期的那样,归一化的rsEMG(0.91±0.10)低于1.0(p<0.05),但归一化的放电频率(0.99±0.08)并非如此(p>0.05)。因此,通过增加活跃运动单位的放电频率(频率编码),肌肉激活增加以补偿缩短收缩后力量产生能力的降低。相反,延长收缩后,rsEMG下降,而活跃运动单位的放电频率保持相似,这表明可能发生了运动单位的撤减。