Biomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-001, Brazil.
Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane QLD 4030, Australia.
J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Jan;11(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 29.
We reviewed and appraised the existing evidence of in vivo manifestations of residual force enhancement in human skeletal muscles and assessed, through a meta-analysis, the effect of an immediate history of eccentric contraction on the subsequent torque capacity of voluntary and electrically evoked muscle contractions.
Our search was conducted from database inception to May 2020. Descriptive information was extracted from, and quality was assessed for, 45 studies. Meta-analyses and metaregressions were used to analyze residual torque enhancement and its dependence on the angular amplitude of the preceding eccentric contraction.
Procedures varied across studies with regards to muscle group tested, angular stretch amplitude, randomization of contractions, time window analyzed, and verbal command. Torque capacity in isometric (constant muscle tendon unit length and joint angle) contractions preceded by an eccentric contraction was typically greater compared to purely isometric contractions, and this effect was greater for electrically evoked muscle contractions than voluntary contractions. Residual torque enhancement differed across muscle groups for the voluntary contractions, with a significant enhancement in torque observed for the adductor pollicis, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, and knee extensors, but not for the elbow and knee flexors. Meta-regressions revealed that the angular amplitude of the eccentric contraction (normalized to the respective joint's full range of motion) was not associated with the residual torque enhancement observed.
There is evidence of residual torque enhancement for most, but not all, muscle groups, and residual torque enhancement is greater for electrically evoked than for voluntary contractions. Contrary to our hypothesis, and contrary to generally accepted findings on isolated muscle preparations, residual torque enhancement in voluntary and electrically evoked contractions does not seem to depend on the angular amplitude of the preceding eccentric contraction.
我们回顾和评估了人体骨骼肌中残留力增强的现有体内表现证据,并通过荟萃分析评估了先前离心收缩的即时历史对自愿和电诱发肌肉收缩随后的扭矩能力的影响。
我们的搜索从数据库创建开始到 2020 年 5 月进行。从 45 项研究中提取描述性信息并对其进行质量评估。使用荟萃分析和元回归分析来分析残留扭矩增强及其对先前离心收缩的角度幅度的依赖性。
各项研究的程序在测试的肌肉群、角度拉伸幅度、收缩的随机化、分析的时间窗口和口头指令方面有所不同。与纯粹的等长收缩相比,先前进行离心收缩的等长(恒定肌肉肌腱单元长度和关节角度)收缩的扭矩能力通常更大,并且这种效果对于电诱发肌肉收缩比自愿收缩更大。对于自愿收缩,残留扭矩增强在不同的肌肉群中存在差异,在拇指内收肌、踝关节背屈肌、踝关节跖屈肌和膝关节伸肌中观察到扭矩显著增强,但在肘和膝关节屈肌中则没有。元回归显示,离心收缩的角度幅度(相对于各自关节的全运动范围归一化)与观察到的残留扭矩增强无关。
大多数肌肉群都有残留扭矩增强的证据,但并非所有肌肉群都有,而且电诱发收缩的残留扭矩增强大于自愿收缩。与我们的假设相反,并且与孤立肌肉制剂上的普遍接受的发现相反,自愿和电诱发收缩中的残留扭矩增强似乎不依赖于先前离心收缩的角度幅度。