Centre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology (COMAP), MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Exp Physiol. 2023 Jun;108(6):827-837. doi: 10.1113/EP091058. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
What is the central question of this study? Conflicting evidence exists on motor unit (MU) firing rate in response to exercise-induced fatigue, possibly due to the contraction modality used: Do MU properties adapt similarly following concentric and eccentric loading? What is the main finding and its importance? MU firing rate increased following eccentric loading only despite a decline in absolute force. Force steadiness deteriorated following both loading methods. Central and peripheral MU features are altered in a contraction type-dependant manner, which is an important consideration for training interventions.
Force output of muscle is partly mediated by the adjustment of motor unit (MU) firing rate (FR). Disparities in MU features in response to fatigue may be influenced by contraction type, as concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) contractions demand variable amounts of neural input, which alters the response to fatigue. This study aimed to determine the effects of fatigue following CON and ECC loading on MU features of the vastus lateralis (VL). High-density surface (HD-sEMG) and intramuscular (iEMG) electromyography were used to record MU potentials (MUPs) from bilateral VLs of 12 young volunteers (six females) during sustained isometric contractions at 25% and 40% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), before and after completing CON and ECC weighted stepping exercise. Multi-level mixed effects linear regression models were performed with significance assumed as P < 0.05. MVC decreased in both CON and ECC legs post-exercise (P < 0.0001), as did force steadiness at both 25% and 40% MVC (P < 0.004). MU FR increased in ECC at both contraction levels (P < 0.001) but did not change in CON. FR variability increased in both legs at 25% and 40% MVC following fatigue (P < 0.01). From iEMG measures at 25% MVC, MUP shape did not change (P > 0.1) but neuromuscular junction transmission instability increased in both legs (P < 0.04), and markers of fibre membrane excitability increased following CON only (P = 0.018). These data demonstrate that central and peripheral MU features are altered following exercise-induced fatigue and differ according to exercise modality. This is important when considering interventional strategies targeting MU function.
本研究的核心问题是什么?由于所使用的收缩方式不同,运动单位(MU)在运动诱导性疲劳时的放电率存在相互矛盾的证据,那么以下两种收缩方式是否具有相似的 MU 特性?主要发现及其重要性是什么?尽管绝对力下降,但仅在进行离心加载后 MU 放电率增加。两种加载方式均会导致力的稳定性下降。中央和周围 MU 的特征以收缩方式依赖的方式发生改变,这对于训练干预措施是一个重要的考虑因素。
肌肉的力量输出部分由运动单位(MU)放电率(FR)的调节来介导。疲劳时 MU 特征的差异可能受收缩类型的影响,因为向心性(CON)和离心性(ECC)收缩需要不同量的神经输入,这会改变对疲劳的反应。本研究旨在确定 CON 和 ECC 加载后疲劳对股外侧肌(VL)MU 特征的影响。使用高密度表面(HD-sEMG)和肌内(iEMG)肌电图记录 12 名年轻志愿者(6 名女性)双侧 VL 的 MU 潜能(MUP),在完成 CON 和 ECC 负重踏步运动之前和之后,志愿者在 25%和 40%最大自主收缩(MVC)下进行持续等长收缩。采用多级混合效应线性回归模型,假设 P < 0.05 为有统计学意义。CON 和 ECC 腿在运动后 MVC 均降低(P < 0.0001),25%和 40% MVC 下的力稳定性也降低(P < 0.004)。ECC 下的 MU FR 在两个收缩水平均增加(P < 0.001),但 CON 下没有变化。疲劳后,双腿在 25%和 40% MVC 时的 FR 变异性增加(P < 0.01)。从 25% MVC 的 iEMG 测量结果来看,MUP 形态没有变化(P > 0.1),但双侧神经肌肉接头传递不稳定性增加(P < 0.04),并且仅在 CON 后纤维膜兴奋性的标志物增加(P = 0.018)。这些数据表明,运动诱导性疲劳后中央和周围 MU 特征发生改变,且根据运动方式的不同而不同。当考虑针对 MU 功能的干预策略时,这一点很重要。