Mickenautsch Steffen, Leal Soraya Coelho, Yengopal Veerasamy, Bezerra Ana Cristina, Cruvinel Vanessa
Division of Public Oral Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Apr;15(2):83-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200002.
To appraise existing evidence for a therapeutic / anti-cariogenic effect of sugar-free chewing gum for patients.
9 English and 2 Portuguese databases were searched using English and Portuguese keywords. Relevant articles in English, German, Portuguese and Spanish were included for review. Trials were excluded on lack of randomisation, control group, blinding and baseline data, drop out rate > 33%, no statistical adjustment of baseline differences and no assessment of clinically important outcomes. Reviews were excluded on lack of information, article selection criteria, search strategy followed, search keywords, searched databases or lack of study-by-study critique tables. In cases of multiple reports from the same study, the report covering the longest period was included. Two reviewers independently reviewed and assessed the quality of accepted articles.
Thirty-nine articles were included for review. Thirty were excluded and 9 accepted. Of the 9 accepted, 2 trials of reasonable and good evidence value did not demonstrate any anti-cariogenic effect of sugar-free chewing gum. However, 7 articles, with 1 of strong, and 6 of good evidence value, demonstrated anti-cariogenic effects of chewing Sorbitol, Xylitol or Sorbitol/Xylitol gum. This effect can be ascribed to saliva stimulation through the chewing process, particularly when gum is used immediately after meals; the lack of sucrose and the inability of bacteria to metabolize polyols into acids.
The evidence suggests that sugar-free chewing gum has a caries-reducing effect. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings.
评估无糖口香糖对患者的治疗/防龋效果的现有证据。
使用英文和葡萄牙文关键词检索9个英文数据库和2个葡萄牙文数据库。纳入英文、德文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文的相关文章进行综述。排除缺乏随机分组、对照组、盲法和基线数据、失访率>33%、未对基线差异进行统计学调整以及未评估临床重要结局的试验。排除缺乏信息、文章选择标准、所遵循的检索策略、检索关键词、检索数据库或缺乏逐篇研究批评表的综述。如果同一研究有多篇报告,则纳入涵盖时间最长的报告。两名评审员独立评审并评估纳入文章的质量。
纳入39篇文章进行综述。排除30篇,9篇被接受。在9篇被接受的文章中,2篇证据价值合理且良好的试验未显示无糖口香糖有任何防龋效果。然而,7篇文章,其中1篇证据价值强,6篇证据价值良好,显示咀嚼山梨醇、木糖醇或山梨醇/木糖醇口香糖有防龋效果。这种效果可归因于咀嚼过程中对唾液的刺激,尤其是饭后立即使用口香糖时;缺乏蔗糖以及细菌无法将多元醇代谢成酸。
证据表明无糖口香糖有减少龋齿的作用。需要进一步设计良好的随机试验来证实这些发现。