Rêgo Emanuel Braga, Romano Fábio Lourenço
School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Alfenas - UNIFAL, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;15(5):412-5. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000500007.
The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of orthodontic metallic brackets photo-activated with two different light-curing sources at different exposure times: halogen light (XL 1500, 3M ESPE) and LED light (Ortholux, 3M Unitek). Sixty bovine permanent lower incisors were inserted into PVC tubes containing plaster. The buccal surfaces were cleaned with pumice and water, and then etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel. The XT Primer bonding agent (3M Unitek) was applied to the enamel surfaces and the metallic pre-coated brackets (Transbond APC II system, 3M Unitek) were attached to upper central incisors. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=15). In Group I (Control), halogen light was used for 40 seconds, while in Groups II, III, and IV were light-cured with LED light unit for 40, 10, and 5 seconds, respectively. The teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. The brackets were submitted to shear bond strength test in universal testing machine (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Shear bond strength means (MPa) were 4.87 for Group I; 5.89 for Group II; 4.83 for Group III, and 4.39 for Group IV. Tukey's test detected no statistically significant differences among the groups regarding the shear bond strength (p>0.05). Neither of the types of light-curing sources or exposure times influenced the shear bond strength of metallic brackets.
本研究的目的是比较在不同曝光时间下,使用两种不同光固化光源对正畸金属托槽进行光激活后的剪切粘结强度:卤素灯(XL 1500,3M ESPE)和发光二极管灯(Ortholux,3M Unitek)。将60颗牛的恒下切牙插入装有石膏的PVC管中。用浮石和水清洁颊面,然后用37%磷酸凝胶蚀刻。将XT Primer粘结剂(3M Unitek)涂覆在牙釉质表面,并将预涂金属托槽(Transbond APC II系统,3M Unitek)附着在上颌中切牙上。将牙齿随机分为四组(n = 15)。在第一组(对照组)中,使用卤素灯照射40秒,而在第二、三、四组中,分别使用发光二极管灯单元光固化40、10和5秒。将牙齿在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时。在万能试验机(Instron)上以0.5毫米/分钟的十字头速度对托槽进行剪切粘结强度测试。第一组的剪切粘结强度平均值(MPa)为4.87;第二组为5.89;第三组为4.83;第四组为4.39。Tukey检验未发现各组之间在剪切粘结强度方面有统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。两种光固化光源类型或曝光时间均未影响金属托槽的剪切粘结强度。