Suppr超能文献

生物膜显示剂及三种牙刷在全口义齿清洁控制中的效果

Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing.

作者信息

da Silva Cláudia Helena Lovato, Paranhos Helena de Freitas Oliveira

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Dec;14(6):454-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000600012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This report evaluated the efficacy of three brushes and one biofilm disclosing agent in complete denture cleansing.

METHODS

Twenty-seven wearers of maxillary dentures were distributed into three groups and received different brushes: Oral B40, conventional toothbrush (Oral B); Denture, denture-specific brush (Condor); Johnson & Johnson, denture-specific brush (Johnson & Johnson). The 60-day experimental period was divided into two techniques: I - brushing (brush associated with a paste - Dentu Creme, Dentco) three times a day; II - brushing and daily application of 1% neutral red on the denture internal surface. Biofilm quantification was carried out weekly and the areas with dye biofilm were obtained by means of Image Tool 2.02 software.

RESULTS

Biofilm removal was more effective during Technique II (Wilcoxon test: p=0.01) for the three groups of brushes. When the brushes were compared in Technique I, the Kruskal Wallis test indicated statistical difference between Denture X Johnson & Johnson and Denture X Oral B40, in which the Denture was more efficient. For Technique II, there was no statistical difference between brushes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The disclosed application promoted more efficacy on biofilm removal, regardless of the brush used. Denture (Condor) was more efficient than the other brushes during Technique I.

摘要

目的

本报告评估了三种牙刷和一种牙菌斑显示剂在全口义齿清洁中的效果。

方法

将27名上颌义齿佩戴者分为三组,分别使用不同的牙刷:欧乐B40,传统牙刷(欧乐B);假牙专用刷(康多尔);强生假牙专用刷(强生)。60天的实验期分为两种方法:一、刷牙(搭配牙膏——Dentu Creme、Dentco,每天三次);二、刷牙并每天在上颌义齿内表面涂抹1%中性红。每周进行牙菌斑定量分析,并通过Image Tool 2.02软件获取有染色牙菌斑的区域。

结果

在方法二中,三组牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果更佳(威尔科克森检验:p=0.01)。在方法一中比较牙刷时,克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验表明假牙专用刷(康多尔)与强生假牙专用刷、假牙专用刷(康多尔)与欧乐B40之间存在统计学差异,其中假牙专用刷(康多尔)更有效。对于方法二,不同牙刷之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。

结论

无论使用何种牙刷,牙菌斑显示剂的应用对牙菌斑清除更有效。在方法一中,假牙专用刷(康多尔)比其他牙刷更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/925f/4327299/e59eee25028f/1678-7757-jaos-14-06-0454-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验