Farhadifard Homa, Soheilifar Sepideh, Bakhshaei Anahita
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Turk J Orthod. 2021 Sep;34(3):170-175. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20079.
The mechanical plaque removal methods of removable orthodontic appliances (ROAs) may damage the appliance surface and may not effectively eliminate the entire microbial plaque.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brushing + denture cleanser tablets, brushing + propolis mouthwash and brushing only for plaque removal from each orthodontic appliance surface. This crossover randomized clinical trial evaluated 32 patients between 7-15 years with ROAs. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups of brushing (control), brushing + denture cleanser tablets (intervention group 1), and brushing + propolis mouthwash (intervention group 2). The plaque removal methods were switched among the groups during three 1-month periods. One month after practicing a certain protocol, the plaque disclosing agent was applied on the surface of the appliance. The photographs of appliances were analyzed by Image J software to calculate the surface area occupied by the residual microbial plaque.
The ratio difference of residual plaque surface area to the surface area of the entire appliance was significant between the intervention group1 and control group (p<0.001), while it was not significant in intervention group 2 and control group (p=0.105). Also, this difference between the intervention group1 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.001).
Simultaneous use of toothbrush with denture cleanser tablets decreased the microbial biofilm on the surface of ROAs, compared with brushing alone. Thus, it seems that the use of denture cleaning tablets may be suitable for effective cleaning of ROAs.
可摘正畸矫治器(ROAs)的机械性菌斑清除方法可能会损坏矫治器表面,且可能无法有效清除全部微生物菌斑。
本研究旨在比较刷牙+假牙清洁片、刷牙+蜂胶漱口水以及仅刷牙这三种方法对各正畸矫治器表面菌斑的清除效果。这项交叉随机临床试验评估了32名7至15岁佩戴ROAs的患者。患者被随机分为三组:刷牙组(对照组)、刷牙+假牙清洁片组(干预组1)和刷牙+蜂胶漱口水组(干预组2)。在三个1个月的时间段内,各小组之间交换菌斑清除方法。在执行某一方案1个月后,将菌斑显示剂涂覆在矫治器表面。通过Image J软件分析矫治器的照片,以计算残留微生物菌斑所占的表面积。
干预组1与对照组之间,残留菌斑表面积与整个矫治器表面积的比值差异具有显著性(p<0.001),而干预组2与对照组之间差异无显著性(p=0.105)。此外,干预组1与2之间的这种差异具有统计学显著性(p<0.001)。
与仅刷牙相比,同时使用牙刷和假牙清洁片可减少ROAs表面的微生物生物膜。因此,使用假牙清洁片似乎适合于有效清洁ROAs。