Suppr超能文献

使用流产布鲁氏菌和羊种布鲁氏菌抗原对流产布鲁氏菌感染牛进行补体结合反应的血清学比较。

A serological comparison of complement fixation reactions using Brucella abortus and B. melitensis antigens in B. abortus infected cattle.

作者信息

Herr S, Lawrence J V, Brett O L, Ribeiro L M

机构信息

Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort.

出版信息

Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1991 Jun;58(2):111-4.

PMID:1908965
Abstract

Brucella abortus and B. melitensis antigens were used in parallel on the National Standard Brucella abortus antiserum and on field sera coming from cattle where practically exclusively B. abortus biotypes 1 and 2 have been isolated over the last 11 years. With the National Standard serum the titres to B. melitensis were consistently lower than those to B. abortus antigen. Most were 1 dilution (twofold) lower. Although a similar trend was seen with the field sera, there were 7/346 sera which had twofold or higher titres to B. melitensis antigen. Although this may be due to the vagaries of the test it also warrants closer investigation of the animals concerned to see whether M-antigen predominant Brucella biotypes are possibly present. The use of the dual antigens could identify herds which are infected only with A-antigen predominant brucellae but would not be reliable for classifying individual animals.

摘要

流产布鲁氏菌和羊种布鲁氏菌抗原同时用于国家标准流产布鲁氏菌抗血清以及过去11年里几乎仅分离出1型和2型流产布鲁氏菌生物型的牛的现场血清。对于国家标准血清,其对羊种布鲁氏菌的效价始终低于对流产布鲁氏菌抗原的效价。大多数低1个稀释度(两倍)。虽然现场血清也呈现类似趋势,但有7/346份血清对羊种布鲁氏菌抗原的效价为两倍或更高。虽然这可能是由于检测的不确定性,但这也值得对相关动物进行更深入调查,以查看是否可能存在以M抗原为主的布鲁氏菌生物型。使用双重抗原可以识别仅感染以A抗原为主的布鲁氏菌的牛群,但对个体动物进行分类时不可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验