Suppr超能文献

在线后稀释血液透析滤过中采用自动压力控制实现优化的对流传输。

Optimized convective transport with automated pressure control in on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration.

作者信息

Joyeux V, Sijpkens Y, Haddj-Elmrabet A, Bijvoet A J, Nilsson L-G

机构信息

Nephrology Unit, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes - France.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2008 Nov;31(11):928-36. doi: 10.1177/039139880803101102.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In a stable patient population we evaluated on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) on the incremental improvement in blood purification versus high-flux HD, using the same dialyzer and blood flow rate. For HDF we used a new way of controlling HDF treatments based on the concept of constant pressure control where the trans-membrane pressure is automatically set by the machine using a feedback loop on the achieved filtration (HDF UC).

METHODS

We enrolled 20 patients on on-line HDF treatment and during a 4-week study period recorded key treatment parameters in HDF UC. For one mid-week study treatment performed in HD and one midweek HDF UC treatment we sampled blood and spent dialysate to evaluate the removal of small- and middle-sized solutes.

RESULTS

We achieved 18+/-3 liters of ultrafiltration in four-hour HDF UC treatments, corresponding to 27+/-3% of the treated blood volume. That percentage varied by patient hematocrit level. The ultrafiltration amounted to 49+/-4% of the estimated plasma water volume treated. We noted few machine alarms. For beta2m and factor D the effective reduction in plasma level by HDF (76+/-6% and 43+/-9%, respectively) was significantly greater than in HD, and a similar relation was seen in mass recovered in spent dialysate. Small solute removal was similar in HDF and HD. Albumin loss was low.

CONCLUSION

The additional convective transport provided by on-line HDF significantly improved the removal of middle molecules when all other treatment settings were equal. Using the automated pressure control mode in HDF, the convective volume depended on the blood volume processed and the patient hematocrit level.

摘要

目的

在稳定的患者群体中,我们评估了在线后稀释血液透析滤过(HDF)与高通量血液透析(HD)相比,在使用相同透析器和血流速率时血液净化方面的增量改善情况。对于HDF,我们采用了一种基于恒压控制概念的新方法来控制HDF治疗,其中跨膜压力由机器通过对已实现的滤过的反馈回路自动设置(HDF UC)。

方法

我们纳入了20例接受在线HDF治疗的患者,并在为期4周的研究期间记录了HDF UC中的关键治疗参数。对于在HD中进行的一次周中研究治疗和一次周中HDF UC治疗,我们采集血液和用过的透析液样本,以评估中小分子溶质的清除情况。

结果

在4小时的HDF UC治疗中,我们实现了18±3升的超滤量,相当于处理的血容量的27±3%。该百分比因患者血细胞比容水平而异。超滤量占估计处理的血浆水量的49±4%。我们注意到机器报警很少。对于β2微球蛋白和因子D,HDF导致的血浆水平有效降低(分别为76±6%和43±9%)显著大于HD,用过的透析液中回收的物质也呈现类似关系。HDF和HD中小溶质的清除情况相似。白蛋白损失较低。

结论

当所有其他治疗设置相同时,在线HDF提供的额外对流传输显著改善了中分子的清除。在HDF中使用自动压力控制模式时,对流体积取决于处理的血容量和患者血细胞比容水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验