De Jaegher Hanne
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):535-42; discussion 543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
This paper comments on Gallagher's recently published direct perception proposal about social cognition [Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535-543]. I show that direct perception is in danger of being appropriated by the very cognitivist accounts criticised by Gallagher (theory theory and simulation theory). Then I argue that the experiential directness of perception in social situations can be understood only in the context of the role of the interaction process in social cognition. I elaborate on the role of social interaction with a discussion of participatory sense-making to show that direct perception, rather than being a perception enriched by mainly individual capacities, can be best understood as an interactional phenomenon.
本文对加拉格尔最近发表的关于社会认知的直接感知提议进行了评论[加拉格尔，S.（2008a）。主体间语境中的直接感知。《意识与认知》，17(2)，535 - 543]。我指出，直接感知有被加拉格尔所批评的认知主义解释（理论论和模拟论）所挪用的风险。然后我认为，只有在互动过程在社会认知中的作用这一背景下，才能理解社会情境中感知的体验直接性。我通过对参与性意义建构的讨论来详细阐述社会互动的作用，以表明直接感知，与其说是主要由个体能力丰富的感知，不如说是一种互动现象。
