Recupero Patricia R
Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):505-14.
Problematic Internet use appears to be a growing concern in many criminal and civil legal proceedings. Problems range from inappropriate personal use of the Internet in the workplace and excessive use of online games, pornography, and gambling, to cyberbullying among children and adolescents and numerous forms of criminal activity. Forensic psychiatric evaluations may help courts or other agencies to understand individual cases and to discern whether a psychiatric disability may be involved. Furthermore, the forensic psychiatrist may be asked to formulate a prognosis or to suggest which treatments may be helpful. Among the multiple underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms that explain problematic Internet use are: addiction, compulsion, impulse-control problems, and mood disorders. There is no definitive or standard treatment protocol for evaluation or treatment of problematic Internet use per se. A comprehensive evaluation should address the underlying psychopathology or personal problems that prompt or contribute to the problematic Internet use. This article suggests approaches that may help forensic psychiatrists to conduct a thorough evaluation with reasonable treatment recommendations. Different formulations of the problem and a discussion of DSM-IV factors are offered to provide starting points for the evaluation and to help psychiatrists to understand how problematic Internet use may relate to Axis I disorders or other factors.
在许多刑事和民事法律程序中,有问题的互联网使用似乎越来越令人担忧。问题范围从在工作场所不适当的个人互联网使用、过度使用网络游戏、色情内容和赌博,到儿童和青少年中的网络欺凌以及多种形式的犯罪活动。法医精神病学评估可能有助于法院或其他机构了解个别案件,并辨别是否可能涉及精神疾病。此外,法医精神病学家可能会被要求做出预后判断或建议哪些治疗可能会有帮助。解释有问题的互联网使用的多种潜在病理生理机制包括:成瘾、强迫、冲动控制问题和情绪障碍。对于有问题的互联网使用本身的评估或治疗,没有明确的或标准的治疗方案。全面评估应针对促使或导致有问题的互联网使用的潜在精神病理学或个人问题。本文提出了一些方法,可能有助于法医精神病学家进行全面评估并提出合理的治疗建议。提供了对问题的不同表述以及对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)因素的讨论,为评估提供起点,并帮助精神病学家了解有问题的互联网使用可能如何与轴I障碍或其他因素相关。