Suppr超能文献

评估微量白蛋白尿时,首次晨尿样本比随机尿样本更可靠。

First morning voids are more reliable than spot urine samples to assess microalbuminuria.

作者信息

Witte Elsbeth C, Lambers Heerspink Hiddo J, de Zeeuw Dick, Bakker Stephan J L, de Jong Paul E, Gansevoort Ronald

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Feb;20(2):436-43. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030292. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

Abstract

Measurement of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in a 24-h collection is the gold standard method to determine the presence of microalbuminuria. We sought to compare more practical alternatives--measurement of urinary albumin concentration (UAC) or albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR)--in a first morning void or in a spot urine sample with this gold standard. We asked 241 participants of a prospective cohort study to make three 24-h urine collections, a first morning void, and a spot urine sample. Regression analysis showed that the ACR in a first morning void best agreed with 24-h UAE. The prevalence of microalbuminuria determined by data from a first morning void (7.5%, whether by UAC or ACR) nearly equaled the prevalence of microalbuminuria determined by 24-h UAE (10.0%), whereas the prevalence was higher when determined by spot urine samples (25.4% for UAC and 22.4% for ACR; both P < 0.001 versus 24-h UAE). The intraindividual coefficients of variation of the ACR in a first morning void and 24-h UAE were similar (19%). Intraindividual coefficients of variations of all other measurements of albuminuria were significantly greater. In conclusion, measurement of albuminuria in a first morning void, preferably as the ACR, is more reliable than a spot urine sample to diagnose and monitor microalbuminuria.

摘要

通过收集24小时尿液来测量尿白蛋白排泄量(UAE)是确定微量白蛋白尿是否存在的金标准方法。我们试图将更实用的替代方法——测量首次晨尿或随机尿样中的尿白蛋白浓度(UAC)或白蛋白:肌酐比值(ACR)——与这一金标准进行比较。我们让一项前瞻性队列研究的241名参与者收集三次24小时尿液、一次首次晨尿和一份随机尿样。回归分析表明,首次晨尿中的ACR与24小时UAE最为一致。由首次晨尿数据(无论是通过UAC还是ACR)确定的微量白蛋白尿患病率(7.5%)几乎等于由24小时UAE确定的微量白蛋白尿患病率(10.0%),而通过随机尿样确定的患病率更高(UAC为25.4%,ACR为22.4%;两者与24小时UAE相比均P<0.001)。首次晨尿中的ACR和24小时UAE的个体内变异系数相似(19%)。所有其他蛋白尿测量值的个体内变异系数均显著更大。总之,测量首次晨尿中的蛋白尿,最好是作为ACR,在诊断和监测微量白蛋白尿方面比随机尿样更可靠。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007.《2007年糖尿病医疗护理标准》
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S4-S41. doi: 10.2337/dc07-S004.
5
Evaluation of tests for microalbuminuria screening in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿筛查试验的评估
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Nov;20(11):2402-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi074. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
6
The three types of "natural" diuresis.三种类型的“自然”利尿。
Lancet. 1950 Jul 1;2(6618):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)91818-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验