Dyer Alan R, Greenland Philip, Elliott Paul, Daviglus Martha L, Claeys George, Kesteloot Hugo, Ueshima Hirotsugu, Stamler Jeremiah
Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611-4402, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec 1;160(11):1122-31. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh326.
Twenty-four-hour urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is considered the gold standard for determining albumin level in epidemiologic studies, but this measure is inconvenient and often unavailable. Simpler alternatives include the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) and urinary albumin concentration (UAC) obtained from a single sample. The authors assessed the strengths and weaknesses of ACR and UAC as alternatives to UAE using albumin measurements from two 24-hour urine samples collected in 1996-1999 from 4,678 participants aged 40-59 years in the International Study of Macronutrients and Blood Pressure (17 population samples from four countries). The authors compared ACR and UAC with regard to correlations with UAE, daily within-person variability, and associations with known predictors of UAE. Rank-order correlations of ACR with UAE were 0.949 and 0.942 for men and women, respectively, versus 0.881 and 0.816 for UAC. Mean within-person coefficients of variation were 34.0-40.0% for the three measures, with the smallest values being observed for UAC. Average correlations with blood pressure were similar for UAE, ACR, and UAC, but the correlation with body mass index was lower for ACR (0.118 for ACR and 0.188 for UAC vs. 0.211 for UAE) because of high correlation between body mass index and creatinine level. Thus, UAC and ACR are acceptable alternatives to the more complex UAE, and the simpler UAC may be preferable to ACR in some respects.
24小时尿白蛋白排泄量(UAE)被认为是流行病学研究中测定白蛋白水平的金标准,但该测量方法不方便且常常无法实现。更简单的替代方法包括从单个样本中获得的白蛋白:肌酐比值(ACR)和尿白蛋白浓度(UAC)。作者利用1996年至1999年从国际宏量营养素与血压研究中4678名40至59岁参与者(来自四个国家的17个人口样本)收集的两份24小时尿液样本中的白蛋白测量值,评估了ACR和UAC作为UAE替代方法的优缺点。作者比较了ACR和UAC与UAE的相关性、每日个体内变异性以及与UAE已知预测因素的关联。ACR与UAE的等级相关系数男性为0.949,女性为0.942,而UAC男性为0.881,女性为0.816。这三种测量方法的平均个体内变异系数为34.0%至-40.0%,其中UAC的值最小。UAE、ACR和UAC与血压的平均相关性相似,但由于体重指数与肌酐水平高度相关,ACR与体重指数的相关性较低(ACR为0.118,UAC为0.188,UAE为0.211)。因此,UAC和ACR是比更复杂的UAE更可接受的替代方法,在某些方面,更简单的UAC可能比ACR更可取。