• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的肝细胞癌预后分期系统的验证:生物标志物联合日本综合分期评分、传统日本综合分期评分与BALAD评分的比较

Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of the biomarker-combined Japan Integrated Staging Score, the conventional Japan Integrated Staging Score and the BALAD Score.

作者信息

Kitai Satoshi, Kudo Masatoshi, Minami Yasunori, Haji Seiji, Osaki Yukio, Oka Hiroko, Seki Toshihito, Kasugai Hiroshi, Sasaki Yo, Matsunaga Takashi

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Oncology. 2008;75 Suppl 1:83-90. doi: 10.1159/000173428. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1159/000173428
PMID:19092276
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The conventional Japan Integrated Staging (c-JIS) score has been reported to effectively stratify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, two new staging systems, the biomarker-combined JIS (bm-JIS) score and the BALAD score, have been proposed. Both staging systems include three tumor markers: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin specific for HCC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three staging systems.

METHODS

A total of 1,173 HCC patients were included in this study. The stratification ability and prognostic predictive power were compared between these three staging systems.

RESULTS

These three staging systems effectively predicted the patient survival. When accounting for the best prognostic subgroup of each staging systems (i.e. score of 0), there were significant differences between the bm-JIS score and the BALAD score and, likewise, between the c-JIS score and the BALAD score. The likelihood ratio chi(2) test showed the highest value and the Akaike information criterion value was lowest in the bm-JIS score.

CONCLUSIONS

The bm-JIS score showed good stratification ability and was thus demonstrated to be a better predictor of the prognosis than the c-JIS score and the BALAD score, especially for the patients with a good prognosis.

摘要

目的

据报道,传统的日本综合分期(c-JIS)评分可有效对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者进行分层。最近,提出了两种新的分期系统,即生物标志物联合JIS(bm-JIS)评分和BALAD评分。这两种分期系统均包括三种肿瘤标志物:甲胎蛋白(AFP)、豆凝集素反应性AFP和肝癌特异性去γ-羧基凝血酶原。本研究的目的是评估这三种分期系统的性能。

方法

本研究共纳入1173例HCC患者。比较这三种分期系统之间的分层能力和预后预测能力。

结果

这三种分期系统均能有效预测患者生存。考虑到各分期系统的最佳预后亚组(即评分为0)时,bm-JIS评分与BALAD评分之间存在显著差异,同样,c-JIS评分与BALAD评分之间也存在显著差异。似然比χ2检验显示bm-JIS评分的值最高,赤池信息准则值最低。

结论

bm-JIS评分显示出良好的分层能力,因此被证明是比c-JIS评分和BALAD评分更好的预后预测指标,尤其是对于预后良好的患者。

相似文献

1
Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of the biomarker-combined Japan Integrated Staging Score, the conventional Japan Integrated Staging Score and the BALAD Score.一种新的肝细胞癌预后分期系统的验证:生物标志物联合日本综合分期评分、传统日本综合分期评分与BALAD评分的比较
Oncology. 2008;75 Suppl 1:83-90. doi: 10.1159/000173428. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
2
A new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: value of the biomarker combined Japan integrated staging score.一种新的肝细胞癌预后分期系统:生物标志物联合日本综合分期评分的价值
Intervirology. 2008;51 Suppl 1:86-94. doi: 10.1159/000122599. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
3
Validation of three staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma (JIS score, biomarker-combined JIS score and BCLC system) in 4,649 cases from a Japanese nationwide survey.对来自日本全国性调查的4649例病例的三种肝细胞癌分期系统(JIS评分、生物标志物联合JIS评分和BCLC系统)进行验证。
Dig Dis. 2014;32(6):717-24. doi: 10.1159/000368008. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
4
Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).肝细胞癌预后分期系统(CLIP评分):其价值与局限性,以及一种新分期系统——日本综合分期评分(JIS评分)的提案。
J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(3):207-15. doi: 10.1007/s005350300038.
5
Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: the JIS score compared with the CLIP score.一种用于肝细胞癌的新预后分期系统的验证:JIS评分与CLIP评分的比较
Hepatology. 2004 Dec;40(6):1396-405. doi: 10.1002/hep.20486.
6
Comparison of three current staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Japan integrated staging score, new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification, and Tokyo score.三种肝细胞癌现行分期系统的比较:日本综合分期评分、新巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期分类及东京评分。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;23(3):445-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05075.x. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
7
Comparative study of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma predicted by different staging systems using multivariate analysis.使用多变量分析对不同分期系统预测的肝细胞癌患者生存率的比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct;31(8):882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.04.016.
8
A modified TNM-based Japan Integrated Score combined with AFP level may serve as a better staging system for early-stage predominant hepatocellular carcinoma patients.结合甲胎蛋白水平的基于TNM的改良日本综合评分,可能对早期为主的肝细胞癌患者而言是更好的分期系统。
Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Jun;41(6):431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Preliminary analysis of a newly proposed prognostic scoring system (SLiDe score) for hepatocellular carcinoma.一种新提出的肝细胞癌预后评分系统(SLiDe评分)的初步分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jul;19(7):805-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03350.x.
10
Staging hepatocellular carcinoma by a novel scoring system (BALAD score) based on serum markers.基于血清标志物的新型评分系统(BALAD评分)对肝细胞癌进行分期
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Dec;4(12):1528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram Based on Platelet-Albumin-Bilirubin for Predicting Tumor Recurrence After Surgery in Alpha-Fetoprotein-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.基于血小板-白蛋白-胆红素的列线图预测甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌患者术后肿瘤复发情况
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Jan 13;10:43-55. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S396433. eCollection 2023.
2
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma - The Changing Tides.门静脉肿瘤血栓形成与肝细胞癌——变化的趋势
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Sep 7;8:1089-1115. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S318070. eCollection 2021.
3
High pre-treatment static and dynamic alpha-fetoprotein values predict reduced overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.
治疗前较高的静态和动态甲胎蛋白值预示着肝细胞癌患者总生存期缩短。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Nov 23;9(3):2050640620972611. doi: 10.1177/2050640620972611.
4
Daily decrease of post-operative alpha-fetoprotein by 9% discriminates prognosis of HCC: A multicenter retrospective study.术后甲胎蛋白每日下降9%可鉴别肝癌预后:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Dec 12;11(23):11111-11123. doi: 10.18632/aging.102513.
5
Newly Proposed ALBI Grade and ALBI-T Score as Tools for Assessment of Hepatic Function and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.新提出的ALBI分级和ALBI-T评分作为评估肝细胞癌患者肝功能和预后的工具。
Liver Cancer. 2019 Oct;8(5):312-325. doi: 10.1159/000494844. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
6
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers.肝细胞癌伴门静脉癌栓患者的治疗:超越已知的边界。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 21;25(31):4360-4382. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4360.
7
Model combining pre-transplant tumor biomarkers and tumor size shows more utility in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and survival than the BALAD models.模型结合移植前肿瘤标志物和肿瘤大小比 BALAD 模型在预测肝细胞癌复发和生存方面更具优势。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 28;24(12):1321-1331. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1321.
8
The status of transarterial chemoembolization treatment in the era of precision oncology.精准肿瘤学时代的经动脉化疗栓塞治疗现状
Hepat Oncol. 2017 Apr;4(2):55-63. doi: 10.2217/hep-2017-0009. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
9
Up-regulation of correlates with tumor migration and invasion and poor prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.[某种物质]的上调与肿瘤迁移、侵袭以及肝细胞癌患者的不良预后相关。 (注:原文中“Up-regulation of ”这里缺少具体所指物质,翻译时根据语境补充了“[某种物质]”)
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 11;8(34):56168-56173. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17040. eCollection 2017 Aug 22.
10
Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management.癌症与肝硬化:对预后及治疗的影响
ESMO Open. 2016 Mar 17;1(2):e000042. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000042. eCollection 2016.